AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Woude, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hogendoorn, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Woude, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hogendoorn, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 593-598, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: value of dynamic MR imaging in detecting viable tumor before surgery

HJ van der Woude, JL Bloem, KL Verstraete, AH Taminiau, MA Nooy and PC Hogendoorn
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. This study analyzed the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced and subtraction MR images in detecting residual viable tumor before surgery, with emphasis on timing of enhancement, in patients with high- grade osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-one patients with proved osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. After IV administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, dynamic enhancement patterns on preoperative MR images were compared with corresponding areas on histologic sections of the resected specimens. On dynamic subtraction images obtained with high temporal resolution (1.5-3 sec), the interval between arrival of the bolus of contrast agent in an artery and start of tumoral enhancement was used to distinguish residual viable tumor. Early enhancing foci (interval artery-tumor < 6 sec) and late or nonenhancing areas seen on MR images were correlated with the histopathologic findings in these areas of the resected specimens. RESULTS. Early and progressively enhancing structures seen on MR images corresponded to feeding arteries, physeal vessels, or residual viable tumor at specific preferential sites on corresponding histologic sections of the resected specimens. Tumor foci as small as 3-5 mm2 could be detected on dynamic MR images. Remnant viable tumor was often located subperiosteally and at the margins of the tumor. Occasionally, active periosteal reaction without presence of viable tumor contributed to early enhancement. Late and gradually enhancing or nonenhancing areas corresponded histopathologically to regions of chemotherapy-induced necrosis, mucomyxoid degeneration, or fibrosis. Alternatively, late or nonenhancing areas were associated with reactive changes such as edema, hemorrhage, or osteomyelitis or with tumor-related extracellular matrices such as abundant osteoid or chondroid. Viable tumor areas with scarce formation of matrix on microscopy, such as small cell osteosarcoma areas or Ewing's sarcoma, showed early enhancement with rapid washout of contrast agent on the dynamic MR images. CONCLUSION. Fast dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences are essential for identifying residual tumor before surgery. A short time interval of less than 6 sec between arterial enhancement and tumoral enhancement strongly correlates with presence of viable tumor. Both therapy-related alterations of tissue and tumor-related matrices must be considered when late or lack of enhancement is noted on dynamic MR images.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. T. Miller
Bone Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions: Analysis with Conventional Radiography
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 662 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. R. Padhani, C. Hayes, L. Assersohn, T. Powles, A. Makris, J. Suckling, M. O. Leach, and J. E. Husband
Prediction of Clinicopathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy at Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging: Initial Clinical Results
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 361 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. T.-F. Shih, H.-C. Liu, C.-J. Chang, S.-Y. Wei, L.-C. Shen, and P.-C. Yang
Correlation of MR Lumbar Spine Bone Marrow Perfusion with Bone Mineral Density in Female Subjects
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. T.-F. Shih, C.-J. Chang, W.-Y. I. Tseng, J.-K. Hsiao, L.-C. Shen, T.-W. Liu, and P.-C. Yang
Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers on Vertebral Bone Marrow Perfusion of the Lumbar Spine
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 24 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A R Padhani
MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(suppl_1): S60 - S80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. L. Bloem, T. J. Mosher, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, H. P. Ledermann, W. B. Morrison, and M. E. Schweitzer
Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging in Bone Marrow Disorders [letter] * Dr Mosher responds: * Drs Schmid and Zanetti respond: * Dr Ledermann and colleagues respond:
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 303 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W.-T. Chen, T. T.-F. Shih, R.-C. Chen, S.-Y. Lo, C. T. Chou, J.-M. Lee, and H.-Y. Tu
Vertebral Bone Marrow Perfusion Evaluated with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging: Significance of Aging and Sex
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 213 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. R. Padhani, A. D. MacVicar, C. J. Gapinski, D. P. Dearnaley, G. J. M. Parker, J. Suckling, M. O. Leach, and J. E. Husband
Effects of Androgen Deprivation on Prostatic Morphology and Vascular Permeability Evaluated with MR Imaging
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 365 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. A. Geirnaerdt, P. C. W. Hogendoorn, J. L. Bloem, A. H. M. Taminiau, and H.-J. van der Woude
Cartilaginous Tumors: Fast Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 539 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. S. WUNDER, G. PAULIAN, A. G. HUVOS, G. HELLER, P. A. MEYERS, and J. H. HEALEY
The Histological Response to Chemotherapy as a Predictor of the Oncological Outcome of Operative Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1998; 80(7): 1020 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. A. Moulopoulos and M. A. Dimopoulos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Bone Marrow in Hematologic Malignancies
Blood, September 15, 1997; 90(6): 2127 - 2147.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.