AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 963-966, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR imaging of diseases of the brain: comparison of GRASE and conventional spin-echo T2-weighted pulse sequences

MR Patel, RA Klufas and AW Shapiro
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare a combined gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) technique, which is a rapid T2-weighted imaging sequence, with conventional spin-echo (SE) sequences for imaging brain lesions. The GRASE sequences would allow increased patient throughput with potential cost savings and be useful in uncooperative patients without requiring echoplanar imaging techniques and specialized hardware. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Conventional SE and GRASE T2-weighted images of 49 consecutive patients (20-86 years old) were reviewed independently by three neurora-diologists for the presence and characterization of lesions (most of which were nonspecific foci of hyperintensity within the white matter), gray-white matter differentiation, conspicuity of lesions, and periventricular signal abnormality. The MR studies were performed on a 1.0-T Siemens Magnetom Impact scanner, with the SE images obtained using a TR/TE of 2400/40 and the GRASE images obtained using a TR/effective TE of 4400/110. RESULTS. The number of lesions detected that were 5 mm or larger in maximal diameter did not significantly differ among techniques. For lesions smaller than 5 mm, conventional SE T2-weighted images showed more lesions (p < .01). The SE images were better than the GRASE images for assessing gray-white matter differentiation, conspicuity of lesions, and periventricular signal abnormality. The two hypointense lesions were better assessed on the conventional SE images. CONCLUSION. Although GRASE imaging may be potentially useful for rapid imaging of the brain, our experience shows it has a markedly diminished sensitivity for detecting lesions smaller than 5 mm in diameter. Currently, GRASE imaging should not replace the routine clinical use of conventional SE sequences.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.