|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 1187-1192, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
PG Taourel, JM Fabre, JA Pradel, EJ Seneterre, AJ Megibow and JM Bruel
Department of Radiology, Hopital St-Eloi, Montpellier, France.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the role of CT in the diagnosis of patients with suspected acute small- bowel obstruction in whom clinical and plain radiographic findings were inconclusive. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-seven nonconsecutive patients with suspected acute small-bowel obstruction were referred for CT to differentiate small-bowel obstruction from ileus (33 patients) or to establish the cause of obstruction (24 patients). The final diagnosis was established either by surgery (42 patients) or by the clinical evolution (15 patients). The change in the prescan diagnosis as to the presence, cause, and severity (strangulation) of small-bowel obstruction made on the basis of the CT findings was noted. Finally, the changes in therapy resulting from the CT information were recorded. RESULTS. CT correctly distinguished between small-bowel obstruction and ileus in all cases except one. CT enabled us to modify an erroneous clinical diagnosis correctly in 12 (21%) of 57 cases, including eight cases for which pre-CT diagnosis was ileus and four cases for which pre- CT diagnosis was small-bowel obstruction. CT allowed us to predict the cause of obstruction correctly in 33 (85%) of 39 patients with confirmed small-bowel obstruction but it failed to differentiate adhesions from internal hernias and radiation enteritis. The pre-CT diagnosis of the cause of obstruction was correctly changed because of CT findings in 17 (44%) of 39 patients with subsequently proved small- bowel obstruction. CT was able to identify strangulation in nine of the 12 patients with proved strangulation, which altered the pre-CT diagnosis in three patients. CT findings correctly modified the management in 12 (21%) of 57 patients, by changing either a conservative management to an operative one in 10 (18%), or an operative to a conservative one by differentiating ileus from obstruction in two patients. CONCLUSION. Our findings show that CT is a valuable diagnostic procedure in patients with suspected acute small- bowel obstruction. CT not only is useful in distinguishing obstruction from paralytic ileus, but it frequently establishes the cause of the obstruction and the presence of strangulation. CT findings lead to decisions to treat patients surgically in a significant number of patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. M. Thompson, R. K. Kilani, B. B. Smith, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, D. M. Delong, and E. K. Paulson Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W233 - W238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Sheedy, F. Earnest IV, J. G. Fletcher, J. L. Fidler, and T. L. Hoskin CT of Small-Bowel Ischemia Associated with Obstruction in Emergency Department Patients: Diagnostic Performance Evaluation Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Hong, A. Y. Kim, J. H. Byun, H. J. Won, P. N. Kim, M.-G. Lee, and H. K. Ha MDCT of small-bowel disease: value of 3D imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1212 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Yau, W. T. Siu, B. K. B. Law, H. Y. S. Cheung, J. P. Y. Ha, and M. K. W. Li Laparoscopic Approach Compared With Conventional Open Approach for Bezoar-Induced Small-Bowel Obstruction Arch Surg, October 1, 2005; 140(10): 972 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Low, S. C. Chen, and R. Barone Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Malignancy: Findings at MR Imaging Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 157 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Osadchy, M Shapiro-Feinberg, and R Zissin Strangulated small bowel obstruction related to chronic torsion of an epiploic appendix: CT findings Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2001; 74(887): 1062 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Furukawa, M. Yamasaki, K. Furuichi, K. Yokoyama, T. Nagata, M. Takahashi, K. Murata, and T. Sakamoto Helical CT in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Obstruction RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 341 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. T. Maglinte, F. M. Kelvin, M. G. Rowe, G. N. Bender, and D. M. Rouch Small-Bowel Obstruction: Optimizing Radiologic Investigation and Nonsurgical Management Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 39 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Lappas, B. L. Reyes, and D. D. T. Maglinte Abdominal Radiography Findings in Small-Bowel Obstruction: Relevance to Triage for Additional Diagnostic Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zalcman, M. Sy, V. Donckier, J. Closset, and D. V. Gansbeke Helical CT Signs in the Diagnosis of Intestinal Ischemia in Small-Bowel Obstruction Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1601 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rosen, D. Z. Sands, H. E. Longmaid III, K. F. Reynolds, M. Wagner, and V. Raptopoulos Impact of Abdominal CT on the Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Acute Abdominal Pain Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1391 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Caoili and E. K. Paulson CT of Small-Bowel Obstruction: Another Perspective Using Multiplanar Reformations Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 993 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |