AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Present, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Present, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 1209-1214, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Osteosarcoma: subtle, rare, and misleading plain film features

ZS Rosenberg, S Lev, S Schmahmann, GC Steiner, J Beltran and D Present
Department of Radiology, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Osteosarcoma is a malignant, mesenchymal, osteoid, and bone-forming tumor [1-3]. In most cases, typical radiographic features clearly illustrate the aggressive bone-forming nature of the lesion. These features include long-bone metaphyseal location, mixed areas of lysis and sclerosis, cortical destruction, periosteal new bone, and soft- tissue mass. However, numerous factors contribute to misleading radiographic patterns of osteosarcoma. They include histologic low- grade, lytic, or minimally sclerotic lesions, early detection, confinement to the intramedullary canal, benign-appearing periosteal reaction, rare intraosseous locations (subchondral, diaphyseal, intracortical), and rare skeletal sites (e.g., soft tissues, skull, ribs, tarsal bones). Secondary osteosarcomas, such as those arising from infarcts or fibrous dysplasia, may also produce a confusing radiologic picture. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to illustrate cases of osteosarcoma that proved to be difficult diagnostic dilemmas because of their subtle, rare, or misleading plain film features.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Stacy, T. D. Peabody, and L. B. Dixon
Mimics on Radiography of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1583 - 1589.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sundaram, W. G. Totty, M. Kyriakos, D. J. McDonald, and K. Merkel
Imaging Findings in Pseudocystic Osteosarcoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 783 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.