AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ravin, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, C. E., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Ravin, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 1353-1358, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs

CE Floyd Jr, JA Baker, HG Chotas, DM Delong and CE Ravin
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE. A new digital thoracic radiography system (Thoravision; Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany), which uses selenium as a detector material, was evaluated for observer preference. The system has been shown to have higher detection efficiency than conventional film-screen systems and thus could provide an image with reduced noise. The hypothesis tested in this study was that the selenium-based digital system would provide an image appearance for conventional thoracic imaging that would be equal or superior to that provided by a conventional film-screen system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patient volunteers were imaged at 120 kV with both the selenium-based system and a thoracic film-screen combination system (InSight HC; Kodak, Rochester, NY). Posteroanterior and lateral images were acquired with both systems, for a total of 212 images. Both imaging systems included a stationary 12:1 antiscatter grid. Exposures were the same for both imaging systems, and the digital images were printed to film. Images for the same patient were compared by six observers--three specialized chest radiologists and three general radiologists. Images included both normal chest radiographs and radiographs with abnormal findings. Each pair of images was ranked on a scale from 1 to 5 for preference of technique, with a score of 3 indicating no preference. Eleven anatomic features were evaluated in the posteroanterior views, and six features were evaluated in the lateral views. Statistical significance of preference was evaluated with Student's t test. RESULTS. The chest radiologists had a statistically significant preference for the selenium-based system for all 17 features (p < .001). The general radiologists had a statistically significant preference for the selenium-based system for visualization of 10 of the 17 features (p < .05). Neither group had a statistically significant preference for the conventional images in any category. CONCLUSION. The selenium-based system provided an image appearance that was significantly preferred by all radiologists, more strongly by those specializing in chest radiography. This study demonstrates that a digital thoracic imaging system can routinely produce images that are perceived as equal or superior to conventional images.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. W. Hamer, C. B. Sirlin, M. Strotzer, I. Borisch, N. Zorger, S. Feuerbach, and M. Volk
Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality with Dose Reduction after Copper Filtration
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 691 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R T M van Soldt, D Zweers, L van den Berg, J Geleijns, J T. M Jansen, and J Zoetelief
Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2003; 76(906): 398 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. S. Kim, J.-G. Im, J. M. Goo, K. H. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. Kim
Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Strotzer, M. Volk, R. Frund, O. Hamer, N. Zorger, and S. Feuerbach
Routine Chest Radiography Using a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality at Standard Detector Dose and 33% Dose Reduction
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 169 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Zahringer, B. Krug, K.-F. Kamm, G. Wassmer, M. Hellmich, G. Winnekendonk, J. Andermahr, A. Go{beta}mann, and K. J. Lackner
Detection of Porcine Bone Lesions and Fissures: Comparing Digital Selenium, Digital Luminescence, and Analog Film-Screen Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1397 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Awai, M. Komi, and S. Hori
Selenium-Based Digital Radiography Versus High-Resolution Storage Phosphor Radiography in the Detection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Without Calcification: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1141 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee
Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas
Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ludwig, T. M. Link, M. Fiebich, B. Renger, S. Diederich, M. Oelerich, H. Lenzen, and W. Heindel
Selenium-based Digital Radiography in the Detection of Bone Lesions: Preliminary Experience with Experimentally Created Defects
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson
Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Garmer, S. P. Hennigs, H. J. Jager, F. Schrick, T. van de Loo, A. Jacobs, A. Hanusch, A. Christmann, and K. Mathias
Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography in Chest Imaging: Diagnostic Performance of a Large-Area Silicon Flat-Panel Detector in a Clinical CT-Controlled Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Bernhardt, D. Otto, G. Reichel, K. Ludwig, S. Seifert, S. Kropf, and U. Rapp-Bernhardt
Detection of Simulated Interstitial Lung Disease and Catheters with Selenium, Storage Phosphor, and Film-based Radiography
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 445 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. G. Chotas, J. T. Dobbins III, and C. E. Ravin
Principles of Digital Radiography with Large-Area, Electronically Readable Detectors: A Review of the Basics
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 595 - 599.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.