|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 1517-1524, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
ET Ilgit, D Yuksel, M Unal, S Akpek, S Isik and B Hasanreisoglu
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transluminal balloon dilatation done under digital subtraction fluoroscopic monitoring in the treatment of incomplete and complete obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system (LDS) in patients with epiphora. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Transluminal balloon dilatation of the LDS was attempted in 19 eyes with incomplete and 61 eyes with complete obstruction, including six cases of anastomotic obstruction after failed dacryocystorhinostomy. A soft plastic arterial sheath over a stump-guiding metal probe was introduced through the superior canaliculus into the nasolacrimal apparatus. A 0.016-in. specially angled steerable guidewire was introduced through the sheath and across the site of obstruction, advanced into the nasal cavity, and brought forward through the external nare. A low-profile angioplasty balloon dilatation catheter was passed retrograde over the guidewire through the nasal aperture to the site of obstruction and inflated for dilatation. RESULTS. Technical success was achieved in all 19 eyes with incomplete obstruction and in 46 (75%) of 61 eyes with complete obstruction. Initial success was achieved in all 19 eyes with incomplete obstruction and in 36 (59%) of 61 eyes with complete obstruction. In a follow-up period of 6-18 months (mean, 13 months), reobstruction occurred in none of the eyes with incomplete and in two eyes with complete obstruction. CONCLUSION. Our experience shows that transluminal balloon dilatation is an effective treatment for incomplete obstruction of the LDS. The procedure has a high failure and recurrence rate when the obstruction is complete.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Ajit, C Inkster, J Tuck, and P Mortzos Orbital emphysema: an unusual complication of balloon dacryocystoplasty Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(924): 1057 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Ko, H.-Y. Song, T.-S. Seo, T.-H. Kim, K.-B. Sung, and H.-K. Yoon Obstruction of the Lacrimal System: Treatment with a Covered, Retrievable, Expandable Nitinol Stent versus a Lacrimal Polyurethane Stent Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 270 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Janssen, K. Mansour, J. J. Bos, and J. A. Castelijns Diameter of the Bony Lacrimal Canal: Normal Values and Values Related to Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Assessment with CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Wilhelm, E. T. Ilgit, D. Bor, and N. Meric Radiation Dose in Fluoroscopically Guided Dacryocystoplasty Dr Ilgit and colleagues respond: Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 577 - 578. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Ilgit, N. Meric, D. Bor, I. Öznur, O. Konus, and S. Isik Lens of the Eye: Radiation Dose in Balloon Dacryocystoplasty Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 54 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Janssen, K. Mansour, J. J. Bos, R. A. Manoliu, and J. A. Castelijns Abscess of the Lacrimal Sac due to Chronic or Subacute Dacryocystitis: Treatment with Temporary Stent Placement in the Nasolacrimal Duct Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 300 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Ko, D. H. Lee, H.-S. Ahn, H. K. Yoon, K.-B. Sung, and H.-Y. Song Balloon Catheter Dilation in Common Canalicular Obstruction of the Lacrimal System: Safety and Long-term Effectiveness Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 781 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Weissman Old Problems, New Techniques: The Interventional Radiologist and the Lacrimal Apparatus Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 305 - 306. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yazici, B. Yazici, M. Parlak, H. Erturk, and G. Savci Treatment of obstructive epiphora in adults by balloon dacryocystoplasty Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 1999; 83(6): 692 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |