AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Boyle, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gosink, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Boyle, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gosink, B. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 197-202, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Duplex sonography of the carotid arteries in patients with isolated aortic stenosis: imaging findings and relation to severity of stenosis

MK O'Boyle, NI Vibhakar, J Chung, WD Keen and BB Gosink
Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to identify carotid artery duplex waveform abnormalities in patients with isolated aortic stenosis and to determine whether waveform abnormalities correlate with the severity of valvular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-four patients with various degrees of aortic stenosis diagnosed by echocardiography and/or cardiac catheterization had preoperative carotid artery duplex sonograms that were retrospectively reviewed for acceleration time, peak velocity, waveform contour, upstroke delay, and presence of a dicrotic notch and a second systolic peak. Data were collected for the right and left internal, external, and common carotid arteries separately. These findings were correlated with aortic valve area and compared with data for a control group of 11 age-matched patients with normal echocardiographic findings. Two additional patients with isolated aortic stenosis diagnosed by echocardiography and/or cardiac catheterization were prospectively evaluated in a similar fashion, with acceleration time being calculated directly from the sonography unit. RESULTS. Unlike the patients with mild or moderate stenosis, the patients with critical or severe stenosis had a mean acceleration time that was significantly longer than that in the control subjects (p = .008-.0001). Peak velocities were decreased in all cases of aortic stenosis regardless of severity only in the common carotid arteries. All 13 patients with critical aortic stenosis had delayed upstrokes and rounded waveforms in the common, internal, and external carotid arteries. Twenty percent (one of five) of the patients with severe stenosis and 17% (one of six) of the patients with moderate or mild stenosis also had these characteristics. The two prospectively evaluated patients, who had critical and severe aortic stenoses, had similar findings. None of the control subjects showed these abnormalities. The presence or absence of a second systolic peak or a dicrotic notch was not different between patients with aortic stenosis and control subjects. CONCLUSION. Increased acceleration time, decreased peak velocity, delayed upstroke, and rounded waveform are characteristic abnormalities found in duplex sonographic studies of the carotid arteries in patients with aortic stenosis. The degree of each of these abnormalities correlates with the valve area. Patients with critical or severe aortic stenosis had findings significantly different from those in the control group. Patients with mild or moderate disease showed few or no sonographic abnormalities.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Kablak-Ziembicka, T. Przewlocki, W. Tracz, P. Podolec, I. Stopa, M. Kostkiewicz, J. Sadowski, A. Mura, and G. Kopec
Prognostic Value of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Detection of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Calcified Aortic Valve Stenosis
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Rigatelli, P. J. Nederkoorn, W. P.T.M. Mali, L. J. Kappelle, and Y. van der Graaf
Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac or Vascular Surgery: Is This a Place for Invasive Selective Carotid Angiography? * Response: Combined Testing of Cardiac and Carotid Artery Stenosis?
Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e89 - e90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
I. Hriljac, S. Gustavson, and J. W Olin
Images in vascular ultrasound: Stenosis of the innominate or left common carotid artery origin diagnosed on carotid ultrasound examination
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2003; 8(4): 287 - 288.
[PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Irace, A. Gnasso, F. Cirillo, G. Leonardo, M. Ciamei, A. Crivaro, A. Renzulli, and M. Cotrufo
Arterial Remodeling of the Common Carotid Artery After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2446 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Brosh, S. T. Higano, M. J. Slepian, H. I. Miller, M. J. Kern, R. J. Lennon, D. R. Holmes Jr, and A. Lerman
Pulse transmission coefficient: a novel nonhyperemic parameter for assessing the physiological significance of coronary artery stenoses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2002; 39(6): 1012 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. M. Horrow and J. Stassi
Sonography of the Vertebral Arteries: A Window to Disease of the Proximal Great Vessels
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 53 - 59.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.