AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karasick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karasick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 63-66, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Is constipation a disorder of defecation or impaired motility?: distinction based on defecography and colonic transit studies

S Karasick and SM Ehrlich
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether constipation is a disorder of defecation or of impaired motility by using defecography and transit studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty- five patients (34 women, one man) with severe constipation underwent defecography and colonic transit studies in a 2-month period. Transit studies included the use of orally administered radiopaque markers and plain abdominal radiographs obtained up to 4 days later. Fluoroscopically guided defecography was performed with barium paste introduced into the rectum. RESULTS. Normal colonic transit time was observed in seven (20%) of the 35 patients. Abnormal findings included colonic inertia in six (17%) patients, hindgut dysfunction in 10 (29%) patients, and outlet obstruction in 12 (34%) patients. Rectocele, enterocele, descending perineum syndrome, and dyskinetic puborectalis were found equally in both groups of patients. Rectal prolapse was more commonly found in patients with hindgut dysfunction and outlet obstruction (p < .05). CONCLUSION. Surgical or medical management of severely constipated patients relies on objectively identifying the underlying pathophysiology. Our findings suggest that constipation is often a disorder of defecation rather than an impairment of colonic motility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Pomerri, A. C. Frigo, F. Grigoletto, G. Dodi, and P. C. Muzzio
Error Count of Radiopaque Markers in Colonic Segmental Transit Time Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W56 - W59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.