AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rieker, O.
Right arrow Articles by Thelen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rieker, O.
Right arrow Articles by Thelen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 269-276, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

O Rieker, C Duber, W Schmiedt, H von Zitzewitz, F Schweden and M Thelen
Department of Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT angiography (CTA) with a single spiral acquisition for the diagnosis of arterial stenoses and occlusion in patients with peripheral vascular occlusive disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and i.v. CTA from the groin to the lower calves were performed on 50 patients with vascular occlusive disease. Maximum-intensity-projection images in multiple views were produced. The accuracy of CTA with and without analysis of the axial scans was determined with digital subtraction angiography as the standard. RESULTS: The sensitivities of CTA were 100% for the diagnosis of femoral artery occlusion, 100% for the detection of popliteal artery (including tibial-peroneal arterial trunk) occlusion, and 94% for the detection of tibial artery occlusion. The specificities were 100%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. When maximum-intensity- projection images were interpreted without axial scans, sensitivities were 98%, 85%, and 92% and specificities were 100%, 99%, and 97%, respectively. For the accurate grading of high-grade (75-99%) stenoses of the superficial femoral artery and the popliteal artery (including tibial-peroneal arterial trunk), the sensitivities of CTA were 88% and 73% and the specificities were 94% and 100%, respectively. When maximum- intensity-projection images alone were used, the sensitivities for the correct grading of high-grade stenoses were 58% and 36% and the specificities were 99% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CTA from the groin to the lower calves is feasible, and the short examination time is a significantly advantage over the time required for other noninvasive techniques. CTA is particularly accurate in the depiction of femoral artery occlusions. Maximum-intensity-projection images are useful, but analysis of axial scans is more accurate for the grading of arterial stenoses. The results of CTA are encouraging enough to warrant further studies. A CTA protocol covering the pelvic and pedal vessels remains to be established and evaluated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Schernthaner, D. Fleischmann, F. Lomoschitz, A. Stadler, J. Lammer, and C. Loewe
Effect of MDCT Angiographic Findings on the Management of Intermittent Claudication
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1215 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. H. Heijenbrok-Kal, M. C. J. M. Kock, and M. G. M. Hunink
Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Multidetector CT Angiography Meta-Analysis
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Albrecht, E. Foert, R. Holtkamp, M. A. Kirchin, C. Ribbe, F. K. Wacker, M. Kruschewski, and B. C. Meyer
16-MDCT Angiography of Aortoiliac and Lower Extremity Arteries: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 702 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
A. Hingorani, E. Ascher, N. Marks, M. Mutyala, A. Shiferson, M. Flyer, and T. Jacob
Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography to Contrast Arteriography for Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lower Extremity Revascularization
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, April 1, 2007; 41(2): 115 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
G H Roditi and G Harold
Magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for peripheral arterial disease
Imaging, August 1, 2004; 16(3): 205 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Catalano, F. Fraioli, A. Laghi, A. Napoli, M. Bezzi, F. Pediconi, M. Danti, I. Nofroni, and R. Passariello
Infrarenal Aortic and Lower-Extremity Arterial Disease: Diagnostic Performance of Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 555 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Ota, K. Takase, K. Igarashi, Y. Chiba, K. Haga, H. Saito, and S. Takahashi
MDCT Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Assessment of Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusive Disease: Importance of Reviewing Cross-Sectional Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. L. Martin, K. H. Tay, B. Flak, P. D. Fry, D. L. Doyle, D. C. Taylor, Y. N. Hsiang, and L. S. Machan
Multidetector CT Angiography of the Aortoiliac System and Lower Extremities: A Prospective Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1085 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Ofer, S. S. Nitecki, S. Linn, M. Epelman, D. Fischer, T. Karram, D. Litmanovich, H. Schwartz, A. Hoffman, and A. Engel
Multidetector CT Angiography of Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Prospective Comparison with Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 719 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. S. Katz and M. Hon
CT Angiography of the Lower Extremities and Aortoiliac System with a Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Scanner: Promise of New Opportunities Fulfilled
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 7 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, A. J. Schmidt, L. J. Logan, and M. C. Sofilos
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Arterial Inflow and Runoff: Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 146 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B Tins, J Oxtoby, and S Patel
Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2001; 74(879): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Múnera, J. A. Soto, D. Palacio, S. M. Velez, and E. Medina
Diagnosis of Arterial Injuries Caused by Penetrating Trauma to the Neck: Comparison of Helical CT Angiography and Conventional Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 356 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Gorich, A.J. Aschoff, K.-H. Orend, V. Mickley, R. Sokiranski, H.-J. Brambs, N. Rilinger, and S. C. Kramer
Diagnostic Value of Spiral-CT Angiography in Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography Before and After Peripheral Vascular Intervention
Angiology, August 1, 1998; 49(8): 599 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M.G. M. Hunink and G. P. Krestin
Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 604 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.