American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 285-289, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Compression sonography in patients with indeterminate or low- probability lung scans: lack of usefulness in the absence of both symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis and thromboembolic risk factors

MP Rosen, RG Sheiman, J Weintraub and C McArdle
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether compression sonography could be eliminated in the evaluation of patients who lacked both thromboembolic risk factors and symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis and who had an indeterminate or low-probability lung scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 155 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral lower-extremity sonography after an indeterminate or low- probability lung scan were reviewed. The presence of thromboembolic risk factors and deep-vein thrombosis symptoms and the result of sonography were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of patients with either thromboembolic risk factors or deep- vein thrombosis symptoms, and group 2 consisted of patients without thromboembolic risk factors and without deep-vein thrombosis symptoms. The incidences of deep-vein thrombosis in groups 1 and 2 were compared by use of a two-tailed Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Thromboembolic risk factors or deep-vein thrombosis symptoms were found in 109 of 155 patients (70%) (group 1). Deep-vein thrombosis was found in nine of 108 patients (8%) in group 1. Both thromboembolic risk factors and deep- vein thrombosis symptoms were absent in 47 of 155 patients (30%) (group 2). Deep-vein thrombosis was found in none of 47 patients (95% confidence interval, 0-8%) in group 2. The difference in the incidences of deep-vein thrombosis in groups 1 and 2 approached statistical significance (p = .0579). The negative predictive value of the absence of both thromboembolic risk factors and deep-vein thrombosis symptoms in excluding deep-vein thrombosis was 100% (95% confidence interval, 93- 100%). CONCLUSION: If both symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis and thromboembolic risk factors are absent, the usefulness of lower- extremity sonography in detecting deep-vein thrombosis in patients with an indeterminate or low-probability lung scan is low. The manner in which these findings may be used to modify individual practice patterns will undoubtedly depend on the rate of detection of deep-vein thrombosis at a given institution.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Mayo, L. H. Ketai, P. A. Loud, Z. D. Grossman, D. S. Katz, and A. M. Gittleman Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, October 1, 2002; 22(90001): S20 - 24. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Sheiman and C. R. McArdle Clinically Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Use of Bilateral Lower Extremity US as the Initial Examination—A Prospective Study Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 75 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text]