AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polger, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polger, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 349-352, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: mammographic and sonographic appearances

MR Polger, CM Denison, S Lester and JE Meyer
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia is a benign, localized form of stromal overgrowth with a probable hormonal etiology. Our purpose is to describe the mammographic, sonographic, and clinical features of this entity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of breast imaging studies and demographic information for seven patients identified as having pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia was performed. The patients were chosen from a 1-year period during which 1661 breast biopsies were performed. RESULTS: The patients were 36-61 years old. Six were premenopausal, and the one postmenopausal woman was on hormone replacement therapy. Three patients wee evaluated palpable breast lumps, and four were asymptomatic. All seven women had noncalcified masses that measured 1.1-11 cm and that were visible by mammography. The border characteristics were as follows: three masses were well circumscribed, two were partly circumscribed, and two were indistinct, probably because they were obscured by overlying parenchyma. Sonography was performed for five patients; lesions were visible in four. All four of these lesions were solid and circumscribed. Five of the masses had increased in size since earlier studies, and one palpable mass was found by physical examination to have grown over time. Two patients had a local recurrence of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. Surgical excision was performed for three patients, large-core biopsy was performed for three patients, and both surgery and large-core biopsy were performed for one patient. CONCLUSION: Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia should be included in the differential diagnosis of a circumscribed or partially circumscribed mass, especially in the premenopausal population. These masses often grow over time and can recur locally. Pathologic diagnosis of the lesion may be difficult unless the pathologist is aware of the presence of a mass lesion and appreciates the stromal changes characteristic of such a lesion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. C. Hargaden, E. D. Yeh, D. Georgian-Smith, R. H. Moore, E. A. Rafferty, E. F. Halpern, and G. T. McKee
Analysis of the Mammographic and Sonographic Features of Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 359 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-S. Teh, S.-H. Chiang, J. W. T. Leung, S.-M. Tan, and J. F. K. Mancer
Rapidly Enlarging Tumoral Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia in a 15-Year-Old Patient: Distinguishing Sonographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Correlation With Histologic Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2007; 26(8): 1101 - 1106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles
Developing Asymmetry Identified on Mammography: Correlation with Imaging Outcome and Pathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. Chen, P. K. Chantra, L. H. Larsen, P. Barton, M. Rohitopakarn, E. Q. Zhu, and L. W. Bassett
Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 993 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. B. Goel, T. E. Knight, S. Pandey, M. Riddick-Young, E. S. de Paredes, and A. Trivedi
Fibrous Lesions of the Breast: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1547 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. Lawrentschuk, R. Archer, A. R. Scott, and A. Hughes
Pseudoangiomatous Hyperplasia of Mammary Stroma: Sonographic Appearance
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2003; 22(8): 817 - 821.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. E. Reynolds
Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1245 - 1250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. Cyrlak and P. M. Carpenter
Breast Imaging Case of the Day
RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 1086 - 1088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. Harvey, C. M. Denison, S. C. Lester, P. J. DiPiro, D. N. Smith, and J. E. Meyer
Fibrous Nodules Found at Large-Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: Imaging Features
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 535 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. W. Piccoli, S. A. Feig, and J. P. Palazzo
Developing Asymmetric Breast Tissue
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.