American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 593-597, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin- echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression

P Soyer, S Le Normand, SC de Givry, C Gueye, E Somveille and A Scherrer
Department of Radiology, Hopital Foch, France.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to compare a T2-weighted breath- hold fast spin-echo (BHSE) technique with T2-weighted non-breath-hold fast spin-echo techniques for imaging the liver. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with hepatic lesions had T2-weighted BHSE images obtained in 22 sec and conventional T2-weighted non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images obtained in 3 min 12 sec with and without fat suppression. Images were analyzed quantitatively by measuring the lesion-liver contrast, spleen-liver contrast, and signal-to-noise ratios of lesions and qualitatively by evaluating the sharpness of hepatic contours, visibility of intrahepatic vessels and other segmental landmarks, and presence of artifacts. RESULTS: Quantitatively, lesion-liver contrast, spleen-liver contrast, and signal-to-noise ratios obtained with the BHSE technique were inferior to those obtained with fast spin-echo techniques with and without fat suppression (11.2 +/- 7.1 versus 15.4 +/- 10.6 and 14.5 +/- 9.8, p < .001; 5.3 +/- 3.7 versus 8.7 +/- 3.5 and 7.0 +/- 3.8, p < .001; 16.2 +/- 8.2 versus 20.1 +/- 10.9 and 19.7 +/- 9.5, p < .01, respectively; Student's t test). Qualitatively, image artifacts and intrahepatic vessel depiction on BHSE images were similar to those obtained with the fast spin-echo techniques. The BHSE technique was superior to fat- suppressed fast spin-echo technique for showing hepatic contours (p < .01; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: The BHSE technique is quantitatively inferior to non-breath-hold fast spin-echo techniques. However, further studies with a surgical standard of reference are needed to compare the three techniques in terms of sensitivity.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, G. M. Choi, S. H. Kim, J. K. Park, B.-C. Song, and W. Kang Comparison of Three Free-Breathing T2-Weighted MRI Sequences in the Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W19 - W27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, G. H. Chung, S. B. Jeon, and J. M. Lee Feasibility of Application of Sensitivity Encoding to the Breath-Hold T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence for Evaluation of Focal Hepatic Tumors Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 497 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Augui, O. Vignaux, C. Argaud, J. Coste, H. Gouya, and P. Legmann Liver: T2-weighted MR Imaging with Breath-hold Fast-Recovery Optimized Fast Spin-Echo Compared with Breath-hold Half-Fourier and Non-Breath-hold Respiratory-triggered Fast Spin-Echo Pulse Sequences Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 853 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hori, T. Murakami, T. Kim, M. Kanematsu, K. Tsuda, S. Takahashi, M. Takamura, H. Hoshi, and H. Nakamura Single Breath-Hold T2-Weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: Value of Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo and Multishot Spin-Echo Echoplanar Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1423 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, and H. Nakamura Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection: Comparison of Four Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR Imaging Pulse Sequences Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text]