American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 705-710, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection

VG McDermott, RJM Fernandez, TJ Meakem 3rd, AH Stolpen, CE Spritzer and WB Gefter
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imaging of the parathyroid glands prior to surgery. Axial T1- (600/20 [TR/TE]) and T2-weighted (2500/40, 80) spin-echo images were obtained using an anterior neck surface coil. The interpretation of the MR image was compared with the findings at surgery and also correlated with gland histology, volume, and weight. Cases in which a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis was made were reviewed to determine the factors affecting detection. RESULTS: MR imaging detected 71 of 92 (77%) surgically proven abnormal glands (sensitivity, 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-86%) and misdiagnosed five (1.6%) of 314 normal glands as abnormal. There was no difference in the detection of enlarged glands in patients presenting for the first time (n = 71) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 66-86%) compared with patients with recurrent hyperparathyroidism (n = 12) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 46-95%). There was no significant difference in the detection of adenomas (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 65-86%) compared with hyperplasia (sensitivity, 71%; 95% CI, 42-92%). Of five patients with ectopic parathyroid glands (1.6%), four had had previous surgery. All five glands were successfully located (three mediastinal, two in the neck). Factors contributing to a false-negative MR imaging diagnosis included small gland size and thyroid disease. Four of five false- positive diagnoses were due to enlarged lymph nodes being mistaken for parathyroid glands. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging is an accurate technique for investigation of hyperparathyroidism. Pitfalls include low sensitivity for the identification of small glands, misinterpretation of enlarged lymph nodes as parathyroid adenomas, and misinterpretation because of thyroid disease. MR imaging is particularly useful in the investigation of patients who remain hypercalcemic following initial surgery.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Johnson, M. E. Tublin, and J. B. Ogilvie Parathyroid Imaging: Technique and Role in the Preoperative Evaluation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1706 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Abikhzer, M Levental, and C Rush High resolution MRI in the detection of an intrathymic parathyroid adenoma. Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 79(945): e78 - e80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Mariani, S. A. Gulec, D. Rubello, G. Boni, M. Puccini, M. R. Pelizzo, G. Manca, D. Casara, G. Sotti, P. Erba, et al. Preoperative Localization and Radioguided Parathyroid Surgery J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1443 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Gotway, G. P. Reddy, W. R. Webb, E. T. Morita, O. H. Clark, and C. B. Higgins Comparison between MR Imaging and Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text]