American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 803-807, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy

JJ Wong, TL Krebs, DK Klassen, B Daly, EM Simon, ST Bartlett, K Grumbach and CB Drachenberg
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore 21201, USA.

OBJECTIVE. Despite the increasing success of pancreatic transplantation for diabetes, rejection remains the most common cause of graft loss. The purpose of this study was to correlate gray-scale sonographic morphology and Doppler resistive index (RI) with acute pancreatic transplant rejection as determined by percutaneous, sonographically guided biopsy of the pancreas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-one sonograms of 36 patients were correlated with sonographically guided biopsies performed for clinically suspected acute rejection. Sonographic studies consisted of gray-scale morphologic assessment of gland size, texture, marginal definition, peripancreatic fluid, and duct dilatation as well as measurement of the average Doppler RI. Biopsies were performed within 48 hr of sonography. After localization by sonography, we performed percutaneous biopsy with an 18-gauge automated biopsy device. RESULTS. Biopsy findings were acute rejection (n = 40, 78%), chronic rejection (n = 2, 4%), and no evidence of rejection (n = 9, 18%). Procedure-related hemorrhage occurred in one patient and resolved spontaneously. Gray-scale sonographic abnormalities were present in 37 studies (73%). The most common abnormality was pancreatic enlargement (n = 23) with a sensitivity and specificity of 58% and 100%, respectively, for acute rejection. Loss of marginal definition occurred in nine studies with a sensitivity and specificity of 15% and 73%, respectively, for acute rejection. An RI > or = 0.7 was found in 11 studies (22%) with a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 73% for acute rejection. CONCLUSION. For the diagnosis of acute pancreatic rejection, sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy is superior to gray-scale and spectral Doppler sonography. Sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy is a safe technique with a high success rate. Gray-scale and spectral Doppler sonography lack sensitivity, and a normal RI should not delay biopsy.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. D. Hagspiel, K. Nandalur, T. L. Pruett, D. A. Leung, J. F. Angle, D. J. Spinosa, A. H. Matsumoto, H. Ahmed, H. A. Sanfey, R. G. Sawyer, et al. Evaluation of Vascular Complications of Pancreas Transplantation with High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 590 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Heverhagen, H.-J. Wagner, H. Ebel, A. L. Levine, K. J. Klose, and A. Hellinger Pancreatic Transplants: Noninvasive Evaluation with Secretin-augmented MR Pancreatography and MR Perfusion Measurements--Preliminary Results Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 273 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Atwell, B. Gorman, T. S. Larson, J. W. Charboneau, B. M. Ingalls Hanson, and M. D. Stegall Pancreas Transplants: Experience with 232 Percutaneous US-guided Biopsy Procedures in 88 Patients Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 845 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Nikolaidis, R. S. Amin, C. M. Hwang, R. M. McCarthy, J. H. Clark, S. A. Gruber, and P. C. Chen Role of Sonography in Pancreatic Transplantation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 939 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S J Green, P S Sidhu, and C R Deane Imaging of simultaneous kidney pancreatic transplants Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 299 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Krebs, B. Daly, J. J. Wong-You-Cheong, K. Carroll, and S. T. Bartlett Acute Pancreatic Transplant Rejection: Evaluation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Compared with Histopathologic Analysis Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text]