American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 909-916, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

The comparison of a rapid screening MR protocol with a conventional MR protocol for lumbar spondylosis

WD Robertson, JG Jarvik, JS Tsuruda, TD Koepsell and KR Maravilla
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7115, USA.

PURPOSE. To assess the degree of agreement between a rapid T2-weighted fast spin-echo protocol and a detailed protocol for the detection of lumbar spondylosis and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid protocol with respect to the detailed protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-eight patients with low back pain were studied with both a detailed four-sequence protocol and a two-sequence rapid screening protocol (acquisition time of 28 and 2.5 min for the detailed and screening protocols, respectively). The two protocol groups were numerically graded for the findings of lumbar spondylosis. RESULTS. Agreement for presence or absence of disc abnormality was 87% for the two techniques. The screening protocol showed a disc abnormality in 91% of all disc herniations and 84% of all disc bulges seen on the detailed study. All moderate and severe (grades two and three in this protocol) bulges and herniations were detected by the screening protocol. Foraminal narrowing, annular tear of the disc, degenerative changes of the facet joints, and nerve root swelling were all better shown on the detailed protocol. CONCLUSION. A rapid, two-plane, single-echo fast spin-echo sequence protocol is adequate to detect potentially significant degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Its 2.5-min acquisition time allows a complete patient study (including patient preparation) to be performed in less than 10-15 min.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Jarvik, W. Hollingworth, B. Martin, S. S. Emerson, D. T. Gray, S. Overman, D. Robinson, T. Staiger, F. Wessbecher, S. D. Sullivan, et al. Rapid Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Radiographs for Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 4, 2003; 289(21): 2810 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Gray, W. Hollingworth, C. C. Blackmore, M. A. Alotis, B. I. Martin, S. D. Sullivan, R. A. Deyo, and J. G. Jarvik Conventional Radiography, Rapid MR Imaging, and Conventional MR Imaging for Low Back Pain: Activity-based Costs and Reimbursement Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 669 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Khanna, T. R. Yoon, M. A. Mont, D. S. Hungerford, and D. A. Bluemke Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Detection and Grading by Using a Rapid MR Imaging Protocol Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 188 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text]