AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minami, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minami, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 943-949, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Cystic lesions of the maxillomandibular region: MR imaging distinction of odontogenic keratocysts and ameloblastomas from other cysts

M Minami, T Kaneda, K Ozawa, H Yamamoto, Y Itai, M Ozawa, K Yoshikawa and Y Sasaki
Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. Differentiating odontogenic keratocysts and ameloblastomas from other cystic lesions in the maxillomandibular region is important because of their high recurrence rates. Conventional radiography, CT, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy are limited for differential diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to review the MR findings in patients with odontogenic keratocysts, ameloblastomas, and other maxillomandibular cysts to determine the value of MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of these lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR images were obtained in 38 patients with 43 cystic lesions of the maxillomandibular region. All the lesions (19 odontogenic keratocysts, 11 ameloblastomas, five primordial cysts, five radicular cysts, and three cysts of other types) were pathologically confirmed by surgery or biopsy. Contrast-enhanced MR studies were performed in 34 patients. Images were reviewed to determine various imaging parameters: locularity, solid or cystic pattern, thickness and contrast enhancement of the walls, and homogeneity and signal intensities of the fluids. T2 relaxation times of cystic components were calculated in 31 lesions. RESULTS. MR images of odontogenic keratocysts showed that the cyst were unilocular in 10 lesions and multilocular in nine. In 10 lesions the cysts wall was uniformly thin and had poor contrast enhancement. Seven cysts had thick walls and two had no definite walls. In 17 lesions, the cystic contents showed heterogeneous signal intensity on T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images, or both. Eight cysts had predominantly intermediate or high T1-weighted signal intensity, and six cysts had predominantly intermediate T2-weighted signal intensity. MR findings in ameloblastomas were different from those in odontogenic keratocysts: a mixed solid and cystic pattern (11 lesions), irregularly thick walls (11 lesions), papillary projections (seven lesions), and strong enhancement of solid components (nine lesions). T2 relaxation times of cystic components were significantly shorter in odontogenic keratocysts than in ameloblastomas, with no overlap. All other cysts showed a unilocular, purely cystic pattern, with homogeneous fluids, although the T2 relaxation times of four lesions overlapped those of odontogenic keratocysts. CONCLUSION. From the MR findings of the walls, solid components, and the fluid contents, odontogenic keratocysts could be differentiated from ameloblastomas in all cases, although some other cysts showed MR findings similar to those of odontogenic keratocysts.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
O Ferreira Junior, J. Damante, and J. Lauris
Simple bone cyst versus odontogenic keratocyst: differential diagnosis by digitized panoramic radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
B Erol, U. Yilmaz, R Tanrikulu, and A Yilmaz
Determinants of MR relaxation rates in jaw cysts: implications for diagnostic values of the relaxation times
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 183 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Yonetsu, J. G. Bianchi, M. J. Troulis, and H. D. Curtin
Unusual CT Appearance in an Odontogenic Keratocyst of the Mandible: Case Report
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2001; 22(10): 1887 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.