AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 1049-1051, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Pneumothorax after small-bore catheter placement for malignant pleural effusions

YC Chang, EF Patz Jr and PC Goodman
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and significance of pneumothorax after small-bore chest tube placement for symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 90 patients with a known primary malignant tumor and symptomatic pleural effusion were referred to the radiology service at Duke University Medical Center. All patients underwent placement of a small-bore chest tube with fluid drainage in preparation for intrapleural sclerotherapy. Two of these patients were excluded because of coexisting empyema (n=1) and thoracentesis (n=1). The remaining 88 patients (30 men and 58 women; 26-86 years old [mean, 60 years old], who had 90 chest tubes placed, formed our study group. The incidence, duration, and clinical significance of their pneumothoraces and the amount of pleural effusion drained were recorded. RESULTS: Among the 88 patients with 90 chest tubes, 27 patients with 28 chest tubes (31%) were found to have pneumothorax after the procedure. For 23 patients with 24 chest tubes, pneumothorax was evident on chest radiographs taken immediately after tube insertion and fluid drainage. Four patients with four chest tubes were found to have pneumothorax on chest radiographs taken the next day. No significant difference in the amount of fluid drained during the procedure was noted for patients with or without pneumothorax (831 ml versus 853 ml). No relationship between the size of each pneumothorax and the size of each drainage catheter was seen. The duration of pneumothorax ranged from 2 hr to 18 days (average, 3.5 days). Resolution of pneumothorax was seen in 22 (79%) of 28 cases; the remaining six cases of pneumothorax (21%) were stable, and the patients showed eventual fluid reaccumulation after chest tube removal and no sclerotherapy. No patient developed tension pneumothorax, respiratory distress, or other complications. CONCLUSION: Pneumothorax should be recognized as a common finding after chest tube placement and immediate fluid drainage for malignant pleural effusions. We suggest that this finding is related to rapid removal of fluid from a relatively stiff, noncompliant lung. Patients whose lungs do not fully re-expand in several days will probably not benefit from sclerotherapy. Their tubes may be removed without risk of an enlarging tension pneumothorax.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. H. Warren, R. Kalimi, L. M. Khodadadian, and A. W. Kim
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions Using the Pleurx Catheter
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1049 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Heidecker, J. T. Huggins, S. A. Sahn, and P. Doelken
Pathophysiology of pneumothorax following ultrasound-guided thoracentesis.
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1173 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Tan, A. Sedrakyan, J. Browne, S. Swift, and T. Treasure
The evidence on the effectiveness of management for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. Parulekar, G. Di Primio, F. Matzinger, C. Dennie, and G. Bociek
Use of Small-Bore vs Large-Bore Chest Tubes for Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions
Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. W. Pien, M. J. Gant, C. L. Washam, and D. H. Sterman
Use of an Implantable Pleural Catheter for Trapped Lung Syndrome in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. VILLENA, A. LOPEZ-ENCUENTRA, F. POZO, A. DE-PABLO, and P. MARTIN-ESCRIBANO
Measurement of Pleural Pressure during Therapeutic Thoracentesis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2000; 162(4): 1534 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. B. Putnam Jr, G. L. Walsh, S. G. Swisher, J. A. Roth, D. M. Suell, A. A. Vaporciyan, W. R. Smythe, K. W. Merriman, and L. L. DeFord
Outpatient management of malignant pleural effusion by a chronic indwelling pleural catheter
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 369 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.