AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kostelic, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Whitington, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kostelic, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Whitington, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 1103-1108, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Angiographic selection criteria for living related liver transplant donors

JK Kostelic, JB Piper, JA Leef, CT Lu, JD Rosenblum, C Hackworth, J Kahn, JR Thistlethwaite and PF Whitington
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to better define arteriographic selection criteria for living related liver transplantation (LRLT) based on literature review, technical and theoretical considerations, and correlation of patterns of variation in hepatic artery anatomy with recipient and donor outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visceral angiograms of 92 consecutive living related liver transplant donors were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists and one transplant surgeon. Arterial configurations were categorized. Recipient and donor outcomes were determined by a review of transplant surgery and radiology records. RESULTS: Anomalous hepatic artery anatomy was identified in 67% of potential donors. A left hepatic artery (LHA) with a diameter of less than 2 mm was identified in 1%, and with a diameter of 2-3 mm, in 5%. A dual LHA supply to the left lateral segment was identified in 11%. Two subtypes were defined. Bifurcation of the LHA into branches entering segment II and segment III less than 1 cm from the LHA origin was present in 8%. A replaced LHA from the left gastric artery (17%) and complex, aberrant branching of the LHA (4%) were identified. Vital LHA supply to tissue other than the left lateral segment was present in 21%, including the cystic artery as a branch of the LHA (4%), significant supply of the right lobe from the LHA (5%), and large branches from the LHA entering segment IV (13%). All three donors with significant supply of the right lobe from the transplanted LHA had complications. CONCLUSION: Absolute exclusionary criteria for LRLT are an LHA diameter of less than 2 mm, dual arterial supply to liver segments II and III, indeterminate arterial anatomy, preexisting vascular disease in donor liver, and a significant LHA supply to the right lobe. Relative exclusionary criteria are an LHA diameter of 2-3 mm, early bifurcation of the LHA, and arterial supply of segment 4 exclusively from the LHA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Lim, M.-J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. I. Kim, J.-S. Choi, M.-S. Park, Y. T. Oh, H. S. Yoo, J. T. Lee, and K. W. Kim
Preoperative MRI of Potential Living-Donor-Related Liver Transplantation Using a Single Dose of Gadobenate Dimeglumine
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 424 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Guiney, J. B. Kruskal, J. Sosna, D. W. Hanto, S. N. Goldberg, and V. Raptopoulos
Multi-Detector Row CT of Relevant Vascular Anatomy of the Surgical Plane in Split-Liver Transplantation
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kim, T. K. Kim, D. J. Jung, J. H. Kim, I. Y. Bae, K.-B. Sung, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, S. G. Lee, and M.-G. Lee
Vascular Complications After Living Related Liver Transplantation: Evaluation with Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 467 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Erbay, V. Raptopoulos, E. A. Pomfret, I. R. Kamel, and J. B. Kruskal
Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: Vascular Variants Important in Surgical Planning for Donors and Recipients
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tanikake, T. Shimizu, I. Narabayashi, M. Matsuki, K. Masuda, K. Yamamoto, Y. Uesugi, and S. Yoshikawa
Three-dimensional CT Angiography of the Hepatic Artery: Use of Multi-Detector Row Helical CT and a Contrast Agent
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. T. Lavelle, V. S. Lee, N. M. Rofsky, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Imaging of Liver Parenchyma: Source Images and Angiographic Reconstructions to Define Hepatic Arterial Anatomy
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. J. Bassignani, A. S. Fulcher, R. A. Szucs, W. K. Chong, U. R. Prasad, and A. Marcos
Use of Imaging for Living Donor Liver Transplantation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. S. Lee, M. T. Lavelle, N. M. Rofsky, G. Laub, D. M. Thomasson, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb
Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 365 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.