|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 1115-1121, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
P Soyer, SC de Givry, C Gueye, S Lenormand, E Somveille and A Scherrer
Department of Radiology, Hopital Foch, Suresnes, France.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare breath-hold three- dimensional (3D) rapid gradient-echo (GRE) MR imaging obtained before and after gadolinium chelate injection with T2-weighted fast spin-echo and T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo (BHFSE) MR imaging in the detection of focal hepatic masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with 108 focal hepatic masses had, prospectively, MR of the liver at 1.5 T. T2-weighted fast spin-echo (6000/117 [TR/effective TE]; echo train length=16; acquisition time = 3 min 12 sec) images obtained with and without fat suppression, T2-weighted BHFSE (2700/105; echo train length = 20; acquisition time = 22 sec), and 3D rapid GRE images (10.1/1.9/30 degrees [TR/TE/alpha]) obtained during one breath-hold (12 scan locations in 21 sec or 20 scan locations in 32 sec) before and after injection of gadolinium chelate were blindly and independently analyzed in consensus by three readers. RESULTS: Gadolinium chelate- enhanced 3D rapid GRE images allowed depiction of more focal hepatic masses (90 of 108, sensitivity = 83%) than did T2-weighted fast spin- echo with fat suppression images (76 of 108, sensitivity = 70%), T2- weighted fast spin-echo without fat suppression images (74 of 108, sensitivity = 69%), T2-weighted BHFSE images (73 of 108, sensitivity = 68%), and unenhanced 3D rapid GRE images (54 of 108, sensitivity = 50%) (p < .01). No difference in sensitivity was found between the three T2- weighted sequences. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium chelate-enhanced 3D rapid GRE imaging is superior to T2-weighted fast spin-echo images obtained with or without fat suppression for the detection of focal hepatic masses. T2-weighted BHFSE is similar to T2-weighted fast spin-echo images in detecting focal hepatic lesions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Parikh, S. J. Drew, V. S. Lee, S. Wong, E. M. Hecht, J. S. Babb, and B. Taouli Focal Liver Lesion Detection and Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Comparison with Standard Breath-hold T2-weighted Imaging Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 812 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Lauzon, H. Mahallati, and R. Frayne Time-efficient breath-hold abdominal MRI at 3.0 T. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 649 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Hecht, A. E. Holland, G. M. Israel, W. Y. Hahn, D. C. Kim, A. B. West, J. S. Babb, B. Taouli, V. S. Lee, and G. A. Krinsky Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR Imaging as a Stand-alone Sequence for Diagnosis. Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 438 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Y. Jeong, D. G. Mitchell, and G. A. Holland Liver Lesion Conspicuity: T2-weighted Breath-hold Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging before and after Gadolinium Enhancement—Initial Experience Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 455 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, M. T. Lavelle, N. M. Rofsky, G. Laub, D. M. Thomasson, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 365 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Rofsky, V. S. Lee, G. Laub, M. A. Pollack, G. A. Krinsky, D. Thomasson, M. M. Ambrosino, and J. C. Weinreb Abdominal MR Imaging with a Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 876 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Semelka, N. C. Balci, B. O. de Beeck, and C. Reinhold Evaluation of a 10-minute Comprehensive MR Imaging Examination of the Upper Abdomen Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 189 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |