American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 1145-1150, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images

S Kang, DA Turner, GS Foster, MI Rapoport, SA Spencer and JZ Wang
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the specificity of the criterion stating that a diagnosis of adenomyosis can be made confidently from MR images of the uterus when the junctional zone is thicker than 5 mm. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty clinically normal women volunteers (chosen by strict criteria) underwent MR imaging of the uterus. Images were independently evaluated by two experienced observers who measured the greatest thickness of the junctional zone in the anterior, posterior, right and left walls of the uterine corpus and at the top of the fundus. RESULTS: The mean value of the greatest junctional zone thickness (averaged for both observers) was 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm (mean +/- SD, range, 1-9 mm) for the anterior and posterior walls of the corpus, 4.3 +/- 2.1 mm (range, 1-10 mm) for the right and left walls, and 2.3 +/- 1.1 mm (range, 1-5 mm) for the fundus. At least one region of the junctional zone was found to be thicker than 5 mm by at least one observer in 13 (65%) of the 20 subjects; at least one region was found to be thicker than 5 mm by both observers in eight (40%) subjects. At least two regions were measured as thicker than 5 mm by both observers in six (30%) subjects. Serial studies of three volunteers showed transient irregular focal or diffuse thickening (up to 12 mm) of the junctional zone and focal myometrial bulging, probably due to myometrial contractions. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that if a diagnosis of adenomyosis is based solely on junctional zone thickness in MR images, 5 mm should not be assumed as the upper limit of normal, because this assumption may result in a high false-positive rate.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Jha, J. Takahama, I. Imaoka, S. J. Korangy, J. B. Spies, C. Cooper, and S. M. Ascher Adenomyosis: MRI of the Uterus Treated with Uterine Artery Embolization Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 851 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Byun, S. E. Kim, B. G. Choi, G. Y. Ko, S. E. Jung, and K. H. Choi Diffuse and Focal Adenomyosis: MR Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 161 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. S. Siegelman and E. K. Outwater Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 5 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text]