American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 111-115, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digitized chest radiographs: acceptable data compression ratios

S Kido, J Ikezoe, H Kondoh, N Takeuchi, T Johkoh, N Kohno, N Tomiyama, H Naito, J Arisawa and H Nakamura
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. To determine acceptable compression ratios for digital radiography, we evaluated the effect of data compression on the detection of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities using digitized chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Screen-film chest radiographs of 38 patients with subtle interstitial lung abnormalities and 40 patients with normal lung parenchyma were digitized (spatial resolution, 0.175 mm; 2000 x 2000 pixels; 10 bits per pixel) and compressed with the discrete cosine transform method at ratios of 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1. Five chest radiologists and five radiology residents examined the uncompressed and compressed digital images and rates the presence of interstitial lung abnormalities with a five-level scale of confidence. Results were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic methods. RESULTS. Overall, the interpretation of images with a compression ratio of 30:1 was significantly less accurate than that of uncompressed images (p < .05). For the five chest radiologists, interpretation of images with a compression ratio of 20:1 or 30:1 was significantly less accurate than that of uncompressed images (p < .05). However, for the five residents, no significant difference between interpretations of compressed and uncompressed images was noted (p > or = .05). CONCLUSION. These results suggest that a 10:1 data compression ratio does not influence the detection of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities. However, information that is lost with a 20:1 data compression ratio might be essential for interpretation by experienced chest radiologists.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L Koenig, E Parks, M Analoui, and G Eckert The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Slone, E. Muka, and T. K. Pilgram Irreversible JPEG Compression of Digital Chest Radiographs for Primary Interpretation: Assessment of Visually Lossless Threshold Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 425 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, D. P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, A. N. Rubinowitz, B. S. Leitman, and J. M. Martino Wavelet Compression of Low-Dose Chest CT Data: Effect on Lung Nodule Detection Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. F. Good, J. H. Sumkin, M. Ganott, L. Hardesty, B. Holbert, C. M. Johns, and A. H. Klym Detection of Masses and Clustered Microcalcifications on Data Compressed Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1573 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text]