AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 211-215, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries

RA Levy and MR Prince
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0030, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate IV injection of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine for three-dimensional (3D) arterial phase MR angiography of the carotid arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nine adult patients were serially imaged after IV injection of a single-dose bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T with a coronal single-slice spoiled two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo acquisition encompassing the common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins. Region-of-interest measurements for the nine patients generated a composite arteriovenous signal versus time profile. The time interval of maximum arteriovenous signal difference was subsequently matched to the center of K-space in a 3D spoiled gradient- echo coronal MR angiography sequence (field of view, 24 or 26 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; slice thickness, 3 mm; number of slices, 12; one excitation; bandwidth, 16 kHz; and scan time, 29 sec). This protocol allowed us to selectively enhance the arterial phase for carotid angiography. The protocol was then tested in 20 adult patients, after which we graded the degree of coincidental venous enhancement and the presence of artifacts. RESULTS. On the 2D dynamic images, we identified a 10-sec window of selective arterial enhancement that began 20 sec after the start of the injection of the bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. With 3D MR angiography, we saw selective enhancement during the arterial phase of carotid MR angiography in nine of 20 patients. In seven of the remaining 11 patients, we saw the signal intensity of the arterial phase exceed a threshold greater than two standard deviations from venous signal. In the final four patients, we saw arterial signal equal to venous signal. We saw no ghosting artifact (from intravascular signal changing too rapidly during phase encoding) in any patient. CONCLUSION. By precisely timing the infusion of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine, we were able to selectively enhance the arterial phase on 3D MR angiograms of the carotid arteries.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Nael, H. J. Michaely, U. Kramer, M. H. Lee, J. Goldin, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn
Pulmonary Circulation: Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR Angiography--Initial Results
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 858 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Krinsky
Evaluation of Arch Vessels: Breath-hold versus Non-Breath-hold Techniques [letter]
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 303 - 304.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, J. Chiras, D. Dormont, and C. Marsault
Proximal Great Vessels of Aortic Arch: Comparison of Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 697 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto
Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. J. Francois, S. M. Shors, R. O. Bonow, and J. P. Finn
Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Transit Times at Contrast Material-enhanced MR Imaging in Patients with Heart Disease
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Finn, V. Baskaran, J. C. Carr, R. M. McCarthy, F. S. Pereles, R. Kroeker, and G. A. Laub
Thorax: Low-Dose Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography with Subsecond Temporal Resolution—Initial Results
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 896 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Wutke, W. Lang, C. Fellner, R. Janka, C. Denzel, M. Lell, W. Bautz, and F. A. Fellner
High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Elliptical Centric k-Space Ordering of Supra-aortic Arteries Compared With Selective X-Ray Angiography
Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1522 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Remonda, P. Senn, A. Barth, M. Arnold, K.-O. Lovblad, and G. Schroth
Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 213 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of CT, Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR, and Conventional Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. M. Masaryk, R. Frayne, O. Unal, A. H. Rappe, and C. M. Strother
Utility of CT Angiography and MR Angiography for the Follow-up of Experimental Aneurysms Treated with Stents or Guglielmi Detachable Coils
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2000; 21(8): 1523 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. R. Hilfiker, R. J. Herfkens, S. G. Heiss, M. T. Alley, D. Fleischmann, and N. J. Pelc
Partial Fat-saturated Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography Compared with Non-Fat-saturated and Conventional Fat-saturated MR Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 298 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Ruehm, W. Wiesner, and J. F. Debatin
Pelvic and Lower Extremity Veins: Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venography with a Dedicated Vascular Coil-Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Tsuchiya, S. Katase, A. Yoshino, and J. Hachiya
MR Digital Subtraction Angiography of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2000; 21(4): 707 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Isoda, Y. Takehara, S. Isogai, H. Takeda, T. Tanaka, M. Takahashi, A. Nozaki, and Y. Sun
Software-Triggered Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Angiography of the Intracranial Arteries
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Van Hoe, T. De Jaegere, H. Bosmans, L. Stockx, D. Vanbeckevoort, R. Oyen, R. Fagard, and G. Marchal
Breath-hold Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography of the Abdomen: Time-resolved Imaging versus Single-Phase Imaging1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 149 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
X. Leclerc, C. Lucas, O. Godefroy, L. Nicol, A. Moretti, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo
Preliminary Experience Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography to Assess Vertebral Artery Structure for the Follow-up of Suspected Dissection
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1482 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, C. Lucas, J.-F. Benhaim, T. S. Michel, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo
Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: CT Angiography with Volume Rendering
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 673 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. R. Melhem, S. D. Caruthers, S. G. Faddoul, R. Tello, and H. Jara
Use of Three-dimensional MR Angiography for Tracking a Contrast Bolus in the Carotid Artery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 1999; 20(2): 263 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.