|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 211-215, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
RA Levy and MR Prince
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0030, USA.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate IV injection of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine for three-dimensional (3D) arterial phase MR angiography of the carotid arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nine adult patients were serially imaged after IV injection of a single-dose bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T with a coronal single-slice spoiled two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo acquisition encompassing the common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins. Region-of-interest measurements for the nine patients generated a composite arteriovenous signal versus time profile. The time interval of maximum arteriovenous signal difference was subsequently matched to the center of K-space in a 3D spoiled gradient- echo coronal MR angiography sequence (field of view, 24 or 26 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; slice thickness, 3 mm; number of slices, 12; one excitation; bandwidth, 16 kHz; and scan time, 29 sec). This protocol allowed us to selectively enhance the arterial phase for carotid angiography. The protocol was then tested in 20 adult patients, after which we graded the degree of coincidental venous enhancement and the presence of artifacts. RESULTS. On the 2D dynamic images, we identified a 10-sec window of selective arterial enhancement that began 20 sec after the start of the injection of the bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. With 3D MR angiography, we saw selective enhancement during the arterial phase of carotid MR angiography in nine of 20 patients. In seven of the remaining 11 patients, we saw the signal intensity of the arterial phase exceed a threshold greater than two standard deviations from venous signal. In the final four patients, we saw arterial signal equal to venous signal. We saw no ghosting artifact (from intravascular signal changing too rapidly during phase encoding) in any patient. CONCLUSION. By precisely timing the infusion of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine, we were able to selectively enhance the arterial phase on 3D MR angiograms of the carotid arteries.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nael, H. J. Michaely, U. Kramer, M. H. Lee, J. Goldin, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn Pulmonary Circulation: Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR Angiography--Initial Results Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 858 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Krinsky Evaluation of Arch Vessels: Breath-hold versus Non-Breath-hold Techniques [letter] Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 303 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, J. Chiras, D. Dormont, and C. Marsault Proximal Great Vessels of Aortic Arch: Comparison of Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 697 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Francois, S. M. Shors, R. O. Bonow, and J. P. Finn Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Transit Times at Contrast Material-enhanced MR Imaging in Patients with Heart Disease Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Finn, V. Baskaran, J. C. Carr, R. M. McCarthy, F. S. Pereles, R. Kroeker, and G. A. Laub Thorax: Low-Dose Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography with Subsecond Temporal Resolution—Initial Results Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 896 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wutke, W. Lang, C. Fellner, R. Janka, C. Denzel, M. Lell, W. Bautz, and F. A. Fellner High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Elliptical Centric k-Space Ordering of Supra-aortic Arteries Compared With Selective X-Ray Angiography Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1522 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Remonda, P. Senn, A. Barth, M. Arnold, K.-O. Lovblad, and G. Schroth Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault Carotid Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of CT, Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR, and Conventional Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Masaryk, R. Frayne, O. Unal, A. H. Rappe, and C. M. Strother Utility of CT Angiography and MR Angiography for the Follow-up of Experimental Aneurysms Treated with Stents or Guglielmi Detachable Coils AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2000; 21(8): 1523 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Hilfiker, R. J. Herfkens, S. G. Heiss, M. T. Alley, D. Fleischmann, and N. J. Pelc Partial Fat-saturated Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography Compared with Non-Fat-saturated and Conventional Fat-saturated MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 298 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Ruehm, W. Wiesner, and J. F. Debatin Pelvic and Lower Extremity Veins: Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venography with a Dedicated Vascular Coil-Initial Experience Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsuchiya, S. Katase, A. Yoshino, and J. Hachiya MR Digital Subtraction Angiography of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2000; 21(4): 707 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Isoda, Y. Takehara, S. Isogai, H. Takeda, T. Tanaka, M. Takahashi, A. Nozaki, and Y. Sun Software-Triggered Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Angiography of the Intracranial Arteries Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Van Hoe, T. De Jaegere, H. Bosmans, L. Stockx, D. Vanbeckevoort, R. Oyen, R. Fagard, and G. Marchal Breath-hold Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography of the Abdomen: Time-resolved Imaging versus Single-Phase Imaging1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 149 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, C. Lucas, O. Godefroy, L. Nicol, A. Moretti, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo Preliminary Experience Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography to Assess Vertebral Artery Structure for the Follow-up of Suspected Dissection AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1482 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, C. Lucas, J.-F. Benhaim, T. S. Michel, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: CT Angiography with Volume Rendering Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Melhem, S. D. Caruthers, S. G. Faddoul, R. Tello, and H. Jara Use of Three-dimensional MR Angiography for Tracking a Contrast Bolus in the Carotid Artery AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 1999; 20(2): 263 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |