AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milette, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Breton, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milette, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Breton, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 217-223, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Clinical impact of contrast-enhanced MR imaging reports in patients with previous lumbar disk surgery

PC Milette, S Fontaine, L Lepanto, R Dery and G Breton
Department of Radiology, Hopital Saint-Luc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. We wanted to assess the clinical impact of the reports of contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the decision to repeat surgery and on the results of repeat surgery in patients with previous lumbar disk surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We interviewed 257 patients who had undergone lumbar disk surgery and who showed symptoms suggesting persistent or new disk herniation. We conducted our interviews 6-18 months after patients had undergone contrast-enhanced MR imaging. We then correlated patient outcome with original MR findings. RESULTS. Fifty-two patients underwent new surgical procedures after their MR examination. Findings of disk herniation on MR images were associated with a significantly greater frequency of repeat surgery. The size of main herniation seen on MR images was also a significant variable. Patients with Worker's Compensation Insurance files had significantly worse prognoses: Only two (8%) of 26 of these patients reported 50% improvement 1 year after repeat surgery. However, only 6 (23%) of 26 non-Worker's Compensation patients reported 50% improvement 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION. Despite its documented high anatomic accuracy, the clinical usefulness of enhanced MR imaging for patients with previous lumbar disk surgery needs further evaluation. In our series, findings of disk herniations on enhanced MR examinations were associated with a greater frequency of repeat surgery, but such surgery relieved symptoms in few patients. The influence of enhanced MR imaging on the decision for repeat surgery and on the type of surgery may be misleading. Selection criteria for repeat surgery need to be reassessed using rigorous outcome research protocols.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.