|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 333-338, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
AH Sonin, AJ Peduto, SW Fitzgerald, CM Callahan and ME Bresler
Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
OBJECTIVE. Although well documented in other MR imaging applications, the value of turbo spin-echo sequences in evaluating the shoulder has not been addressed. This study was designed to directly compare matched spin-echo and turbo spin-echo sequences in the MR imaging evaluation of the rotator cuff. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using otherwise matched double- echo sequences of equal time duration, we performed 123 paired spin- echo (TR/TE, 200/25,75; one excitation) and turbo spin-echo (3500- 5000/22,90; two excitations) sequences in the paracoronal and/or parasagittal plane of the shoulders of 76 patients referred to our institution for possible rotator cuff tear. The sequences were retrospectively analyzed for cuff signal and morphology, fluid conspicuity, coracoacromial arch morphology, and bone marrow signal abnormalities. Surgical and nonsurgical clinical results were correlated when available. RESULTS. We found 100% diagnostic correlation between spin-echo and turbo spin-echo sequences for rotator cuff integrity. Surgical data were available for 26 patients, and clinical follow-up for another 37. For complete rotator cuff tear in the surgical subpopulation, sensitivity was 89%, specificity was 94%, and diagnostic accuracy was 24 of 26 (92%). We found no diagnostically significant difference between the two imaging sequences for fluid conspicuity, coracoacromial morphology, or marrow signal. Signal-to- noise ratios were superior in the turbo spin-echo sequences. CONCLUSION. Turbo spin-echo sequences are an accurate and efficient tool in the MR imaging evaluation of the rotator cuff. Potential benefits include time saving, increased spatial resolution, and improved signal-to-noise ratio.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Kijowski, J. M. Farber, J. Medina, W. Morrison, J. Ying, and K. Buckwalter Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Fast Spin-Echo Sequence and Modified STIR Sequence in the Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Tendon Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 371 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Teefey, D. A. Rubin, W. D. Middleton, C. F. Hildebolt, R. A. Leibold, and K. Yamaguchi Detection and Quantification of Rotator Cuff Tears. Comparison of Ultrasonographic, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Findings in Seventy-one Consecutive Cases J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 708 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Spielmann, B. B. Forster, P. Kokan, R. H. Hawkins, and D. L. Janzen Shoulder after Rotator Cuff Repair: MR Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Individuals-Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 705 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. HERZOG Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 934 - 53. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |