AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carney, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Littenberg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carney, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Littenberg, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 367-372, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

The New Hampshire Mammography Network: the development and design of a population-based registry

PA Carney, SP Poplack, WA Wells and B Littenberg
Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

OBJECTIVE. Some authors have proposed a national mammography registry to improve and monitor breast diagnostic practices. However, issues such as confidentiality, accuracy, and direct and indirect costs are practical barriers to implementing such a registry. This paper describes the development and design of a population-based mammography registry in New Hampshire. The project's objectives are to assess the accuracy of mammography by comparing interpretive results with pathology and tumor-registry reports and to improve mammographic performance by reporting findings to facilities, radiologists, and pathologists statewide. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We recruited radiologists and pathologists through professional associations and facilities through site visits. Data used to develop and design the registry were collected during site visits, using structured face-to- face interview methods. Only one site refused to provide site-specific information. RESULTS. Facilities in New Hampshire estimated the annual mammographic volume to be approximately 148,000. We have noted a great deal of variability in mammography practices. Their principal methods for determining screening versus diagnostic mammograms were by patient self-reports (44% of practices), referring physicians' reports (38%), and radiologists' reports (18%). Although 71% of practices have computers, only 16% have radiology information systems or hospital information systems that offer computerized patient-tracking capabilities. More than 90% of New Hampshire radiologists exclusively use freehand dictation for reporting, and although almost 50% codify reports, only 11% use the American College of Radiology lexicon. These data and concerns expressed by radiologists, pathologists, technologists, and administrators helped shape the New Hampshire registry. CONCLUSION. Heterogeneity of radiologic practices poses major challenges for implementing a population-based mammography registry. Issues such as confidentiality, the difficulty of assessing diagnostic acumen, and the time involved in providing data to a registry must be adequately addressed. For the registry to succeed in such diverse settings, researchers, radiologists, pathologists, technologists, and administrative staff must collaborate and cooperate.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
P. A. Carney, E. Steiner, M. E. Goodrich, A. J. Dietrich, C. J. Kasales, J. E. Weiss, and T. MacKenzie
Discovery of Breast Cancers Within 1 Year of a Normal Screening Mammogram: How Are They Found?
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. White, P. A. Carney, and A. S. Kolar
Increasing Response to Mailed Questionnaires by Including a Pencil/Pen
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 162(3): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Elmore, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, G. R. Cutter, C. J. D'Orsi, R. E. Hendrick, L. A. Abraham, J. S. Fosse, and P. A. Carney
Does Litigation Influence Medical Practice? The Influence of Community Radiologists' Medical Malpractice Perceptions and Experience on Screening Mammography
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. R. Egger, G. R. Cutter, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, J. S. Fosse, L. Abraham, and J. G. Elmore
Mammographers' Perception of Women's Breast Cancer Risk
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. T. Leung
Screening Mammography Reduces Morbidity of Breast Cancer Treatment
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1508 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D'Orsi, S.-P. Tu, C. Nakano, P. A. Carney, L. A. Abraham, S. H. Taplin, R. E. Hendrick, G. R. Cutter, E. Berns, W. E. Barlow, et al.
Current Realities of Delivering Mammography Services in the Community: Do Challenges with Staffing and Scheduling Exist?
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 391 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. E. Hendrick, G. R. Cutter, E. A. Berns, C. Nakano, J. Egger, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, S. H. Taplin, C. J. D'Orsi, W. Barlow, et al.
Community-Based Mammography Practice: Services, Charges, and Interpretation Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Poplack, P. A. Carney, J. E. Weiss, L. Titus-Ernstoff, M. E. Goodrich, and A. N. A. Tosteson
Screening Mammography: Costs and Use of Screening-related Services
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Barth Jr., G. R. Gibson, P. A. Carney, L. A. Mott, R. D. Becher, and S. P. Poplack
Detection of Breast Cancer on Screening Mammography Allows Patients to Be Treated with Less-Toxic Therapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore
Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1840 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. A. Carney, J. G. Elmore, L. A. Abraham, M. S. Gerrity, R. E. Hendrick, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, G. R. Cutter, S. P. Poplack, and C. J. D'Orsi
Radiologist Uncertainty and the Interpretation of Screening
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2004; 24(3): 255 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. R. Yabroff, N. Breen, S. W. Vernon, H. I. Meissner, A. N. Freedman, and R. Ballard-Barbash
What Factors Are Associated with Diagnostic Follow-Up after Abnormal Mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 723 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Poplack, K. D. Paulsen, A. Hartov, P. M. Meaney, B. W. Pogue, T. D. Tosteson, M. R. Grove, S. K. Soho, and W. A. Wells
Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Average Tissue Property Values in Women with Negative Clinical Findings
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 571 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Poplack, A. N. Tosteson, M. R. Grove, W. A. Wells, and P. A. Carney
Mammography in 53,803 Women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 832 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. A. Carney, B. M. Geller, H. Moffett, M. Ganger, M. Sewell, W. E. Barlow, N. Stalnaker, S. H. Taplin, C. Sisk, V. L. Ernster, et al.
Current Medicolegal and Confidentiality Issues in Large, Multicenter Research Programs
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2000; 152(4): 371 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.