AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glickerman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glickerman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 445-451, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography

DJ Glickerman, RG Obregon, UP Schmiedl, SD Harrison, SE Macaulay, HE Simon and TR Kohler
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98108, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate cardiac-gated two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-three patients with PAOD were studied using cardiac- gated 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the body coil from each patients' aortic bifurcation to the pedal arches. Blinded comparison with conventional angiograms was used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of this MR angiography technique. Kappa statistics were used to compare treatment plans of these patients studied with MR angiography and with conventional angiography. RESULTS. In the aortoiliac region, MR angiography had a correlation coefficient of .89 for all degrees of narrowing. For hemodynamically significant lesions, MR angiography had an 89% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 84% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. In the femoral region, MR angiography had a correlation coefficient of .91 for all degrees of narrowing. For hemodynamically significant lesions, MR angiography had an 89% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 93% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. In the popliteal region, MR angiography had a correlation coefficient of .93 for all degrees of narrowing. For hemodynamically significant lesions, MR angiography had an 89% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 94% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value. In the tibioperoneal and foot regions, MR angiography had a correlation coefficient of 88% for all degrees of narrowing. For hemodynamically significant lesions, MR angiography had an 86% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 89% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value. When the treatment planning data were classified into one of four outcomes (no intervention, surgery, percutaneous angioplasty, or further diagnostic study), MR angiography and conventional angiography had excellent agreement, with a Cohen's kappa value of .78. CONCLUSION. Cardiac-gated 2D time-of-flight MR angiography that uses the body coil provides a useful examination for PAOD with reasonable resolution. This imaging technique is potentially more time-efficient than techniques using extremity coils.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Schaefer, F. P. Boudghene, H. J. Brambs, M. Bret-Zurita, J. L. Caniego, R. A. Coulden, H. B. Gehl, R. Hammerstingl, A. Huber, R. J. Mendez, et al.
Abdominal and Iliac Arterial Stenoses: Comparative Double-blinded Randomized Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D MR Angiography with Gadodiamide or Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 827 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. V. Pandharipande, V. S. Lee, P. M. Reuss, H. W. Charles, R. J. Rosen, G. A. Krinsky, J. C. Weinreb, and N. M. Rofsky
Two-Station Bolus-Chase MR Angiography with a Stationary Table: A Simple Alternative to Automated-Table Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1583 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. W. Koelemay, J. G. Lijmer, J. Stoker, D. A. Legemate, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, March 14, 2001; 285(10): 1338 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Nelemans, T. Leiner, H. C. W. de Vet, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven
Peripheral Arterial Disease: Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of MR Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 105 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. M. Rofsky and M. A. Adelman
MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. M. Meaney, J. P. Ridgway, S. Chakraverty, I. Robertson, D. Kessel, A. Radjenovic, M. Kouwenhoven, A. Kassner, and M. A. Smith
Stepping-Table Gadolinium- enhanced Digital Subtraction MR Angiography of the Aorta and Lower Extremity Arteries: Preliminary Experience
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.