AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loubeyre, P.
Right arrow Articles by Minh, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loubeyre, P.
Right arrow Articles by Minh, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 489-494, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences

P Loubeyre, P Trolliet, R Cahen, F Grozel, M Labeeuw and VA Minh
Departement de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Benite, France.

OBJECTIVE. It has been reported and also has been our preliminary experience that many false ostial stenoses are attributable to a loss of signal intensity at the origin of the renal arteries when three- dimensional (3D) phase-contrast MR angiography is used. Our objective was to add a 3D time-of-flight MR angiography sequence to the 3D phase- contrast MR angiography sequence to better analyze the origin of the main renal arteries. We assessed the value of the combination of these two MR angiography sequences for the depiction of renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-six patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis on the basis of clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory data were prospectively enrolled. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography findings were available for all patients. Using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, we considered stenosis to be significant when the vessel was narrowed more than 50%. During MR angiography, half of the data were reconstructed by interpolation to avoid long acquisition times. Total acquisition times were less than 15 min. MR angiography findings were interpreted independently by two radiologists who were unaware of the findings of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. With 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, any cutoff in signal intensity or any narrowing of the vessel diameter of more than 50% from the renal ostium to the renal hilum was considered to represent significant stenosis. With 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, our image analysis was focused on the origin of the arteries. Any cutoff in signal intensity in the first centimeter of the renal artery was considered to represent significant stenosis. RESULTS. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography showed 105 renal arteries, including 15 supernumerary renal arteries. Eleven stenoses were localized to the main hilar renal arteries. Using time-of-flight MR angiography, we found that polar supernumerary renal arteries of small caliber and intrarenal branches of renal arteries were not adequately displayed. Using phase-contrast MR angiography to evaluate only whether the main hilar renal arteries were stenotic, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy to be 100%, 65%, 28%, 100%, and 69%, respectively. Using a combination of the two imaging sequences, we found that the specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were increased to 90%, 58%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION. For detecting stenoses of the main renal arteries but not for visualizing small accessory renal arteries or distal branches, our results support the use of a combination of the two MR angiography sequences. For now, this combination of sequences should be viewed primarily as a technique for screening patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. U. Herborn, D. M. Watkins, V. M. Runge, J. M. Gendron, M. L. Montgomery, and L. G. Naul
Renal Arteries: Comparison of Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. B. C. Vasbinder, P. J. Nelemans, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, P. W. de Leeuw, and J. M.A. van Engelshoven
Diagnostic Tests for Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients Suspected of Having Renovascular Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis
Ann Intern Med, September 18, 2001; 135(6): 401 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. De Cobelli, M. Venturini, A. Vanzulli, S. Sironi, M. Salvioni, E. Angeli, P. Scifo, M. P. Garancini, R. Quartagno, G. Bianchi, et al.
Renal Arterial Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of Color Doppler US and Breath-hold, Three-dimensional, Dynamic, Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Q. Dong, S. O. Schoenberg, R. C. Carlos, M. Neimatallah, K. J. Cho, D. M. Williams, S. N. Kazanjian, and M. R. Prince
Diagnosis of Renal Vascular Disease with MR Angiography
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1535 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. C. Carlos, Q. Dong, J. C. Stanley, and M. R. Prince
MR Angiography after Renal Revascularization: Spectrum of Expected Anatomic Results and Postintervention Complications
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1555 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. O. Schoenberg, M. Bock, M. V. Knopp, M. Essig, G. Laub, H. Hawighorst, I. Zuna, F. Kallinowski, and G. van Kaick
Renal Arteries: Optimization of Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography with Bolus-timing–independent Fast Multiphase Acquisition in a Single Breath Hold
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 667 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.