American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 571-579, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship

RM Slone
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Over half of the major papers published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) have five or more coauthors. This project was designed to evaluate the specific contributions of coauthors and the prevalence of undeserved authorship in major papers from institutions in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to the first author of 275 major papers from institutions in the United States that were published in the AJR in 1992 and 1993. Questions focused on coauthors' contributions to research design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation, and on undeserving authorship. RESULTS: One hundred ninety- six (72%) of the surveys were returned. Ninety-nine percent of first authors, 75% of second authors, fewer than half of third authors, and one third of fourth authors and beyond were said to have contributed to at least three of the following: research design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation (p < .02). A strong correlation was indicated between authorship position and contribution (r = -.69, p < .001), with a mean overall contribution of 63 +/- 17% (mean +/- SD) for the first author, 20 +/- 12% for the second author, 10 +/- 7% for the third author, 7 +/- 6% for the fourth author, and 5 +/- 5% for all other authors. Coauthors were listed in decreasing order of contribution in 70% of articles. However, the last author was the second major contributor in 10% of articles with three or more authors. The incidence of "undeserved" coauthors increased from 9% on papers with three authors to 30% on papers with more than six authors (mean, 17%; r = .97; p < .001). Undeserved authorship was attributed largely to individuals who contributed only cases (29%) or who created a sense of obligation or fear in the first author (40%). Manuscripts were more likely to include an undeserved coauthor when the first author was a nontenured staff member (45%) than when he or she was tenured faculty (28%) (p < .02). When decision about authorship were made at project conception, there were fewer coauthors (3.9 versus 5.4, p < .02) and a lower incidence of manuscripts with undeserving coauthors (23% versus 47%, p < .01). The final manuscript was read by all coauthors in 80% of manuscripts, and all coauthors were thought to understand the manuscript to the extent they could publicly defend it in 78% of manuscripts. The most commonly cited reason that otherwise honest individuals accept undeserved authorship was academic promotion. CONCLUSION: Undeserved authorship is a common and serious problem that is motivated primarily by academic promotion policies. The first two authors are said to account for the preponderance of work in almost all major papers.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Miguel-Dasit, L. Marti-Bonmati, P. Sanfeliu, and R. Aleixandre Cardiac MR Imaging: Balanced Publication by Radiologists and Cardiologists Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 410 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gomez-Alonso Author! Author! JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1815 - 1815. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Hwang, H. H. Song, J. H. Baik, S. L. Jung, S. H. Park, K. H. Choi, and Y. H. Park Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria: Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published in Radiology Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 16 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ozsunar, A. Unsal, A. Akdilli, C. Karaman, T. A. G. M. Huisman, and A. G. Sorensen Technology and Archives in Radiology Research: A Sampling Analysis of Articles Published in the AJR and Radiology Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1281 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Probyn, M. R. Asch, and A. V. Proto The Effect of Changes in Guidelines for Authorship on Current Radiology Publications Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 615 - 616. [Full Text]

				J. P. H. Drenth Multiple Authorship: The Contribution of Senior Authors JAMA, July 15, 1998; 280(3): 219 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Flanagin, L. A. Carey, P. B. Fontanarosa, S. G. Phillips, B. P. Pace, G. D. Lundberg, and D. Rennie Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals JAMA, July 15, 1998; 280(3): 222 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]