American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 725-729, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen

RG Sheiman, V Raptopoulos, P Caruso, T Vrachliotis and J Pearlman
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen are currently individualized by matching a scan delay to the transit time of a test bolus of IV contrast material to the abdominal aorta. We sought to determine whether this procedure improves the extent and uniformity of aortic enhancement when compared with the use of a standard scan delay that is determined empirically. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CT angiography of the upper abdomen (either the entire abdominal aorta or the aorta spanning the length of both kidneys for dedicated renal studies) was obtained in 48 patients who were considered to have normal cardiac function as determined by their referring physicians. Patients were randomized to undergo CT angiography that used either a standard scan delay of 20 or 22 sec (group 1, n = 26) or a tailored scan delay (group 2, n = 22), all other imaging parameters being identical. Tailored delays were determined by measuring contrast transit time to the abdominal aorta with software from the SmartPrep system. For each patient, aortic attenuation was measured at three different anatomic levels, and a lower threshold of 160 H was considered optimal. The number of attenuation values above this threshold, the mean attenuation, and the attenuation changes for each unit length along the abdominal aorta were then compared for the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (74%) of 78 aortic attenuation values in group 1 and 55 (88%) of 69 in group 2 were above 160 H. Mean attenuation values were 192.2 H +/- 8.1 (+/-SE) in group 1 and 199.2 H +/- 10.1 in group 2. These values and the attenuation changes for each unit length along the abdominal aorta-3.7 H/cm +/- 1.7 for group 1 and 2.2 H/cm +/- 2.0 for group 2- were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Tailoring the scan delay for CT angiography of the abdomen in patients considered to have normal cardiac function requires additional IV contrast agent, time, and patient imaging and does not improve the extent or uniformity of aortic enhancement over that obtained with a standard, empiric scan delay.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, and Y. Yamashita Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W490 - W497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, H. Satake, T. Ota, and T. Ishigaki The effect of patient age on contrast enhancement during CT of the pancreatobiliary region. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 505 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-F. Ko, C.-C. Huang, S.-H. Ng, T.-Y. Lee, M.-J. Hsieh, F.-Y. Lee, M.-C. Chen, S.-M. Sheen-Chen, and C.-H. Lee MDCT Angiography for Evaluation of the Complete Vascular Tree of Hemodialysis Fistulas Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1268 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Bae, F. Cademartiri, and G. P. Krestin Test-Bolus versus Bolus-tracking Techniques for CT Angiographic Timing * Drs Cademartiri and Krestin respond: Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 369 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chicoskie and R. Tello Gadolinium-Enhanced MDCT Angiography of the Abdomen: Feasibility and Limitations Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1821 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, J. Thomas, E. I. Gimenez, and D. M. DeLong Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT: Optimization with Interactive Determination of Scanning Delay and Contrast Medium Dose Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 854 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Kuhle and R. G. Sheiman Detection of Active Colonic Hemorrhage with Use of Helical CT: Findings in a Swine Model Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 743 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Bae Peak Contrast Enhancement in CT and MR Angiography: When Does It Occur and Why? Pharmacokinetic Study in a Porcine Model Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. K. Hussain, F. J. Londy, I. R. Francis, H. V. Nghiem, W. J. Weadock, A. Gebremariam, and T. L. Chenevert Hepatic Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Automated Bolus-Detection Three-dimensional Fast Gradient-Recalled-Echo Sequence: Comparison with Test-Bolus Method Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 558 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Macari, G. M. Israel, P. Berman, M. Lisi, A. J. Tolia, M. Adelman, and A. J. Megibow Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography: Intravascular Enhancement without a Timing Acquisition Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 519 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Fleischmann, G. D. Rubin, A. A. Bankier, and K. Hittmair Improved Uniformity of Aortic Enhancement with Customized Contrast Medium Injection Protocols at CT Angiography Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text]