American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 771-776, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Helical CT of renal masses: the value of delayed scans

RK Zeman, A Zeiberg, WS Hayes, PM Silverman, C Cooper and BS Garra
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Routine scanning techniques used for helical CT of the abdomen result in dense cortical opacification of the kidney, whereas the medulla and collecting system are not well opacified, which potentially compromises detection of renal masses. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if additional delayed views (taken approximately 2-4 min after the start of injection of contrast material) are necessary for the detection and characterization of renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Early (60-70 sec after the start of the injection of contrast material) and delayed scans of 40 patients with suspected renal masses were blindly evaluated by two observers. The patients harbored a total of 187 renal masses (including 62 solid masses). Each region of the kidney (upper, middle, and lower pole) was scored for the presence of a mass. Scoring was done as a binary decision and also as a five-point confidence score for receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: We found 97 regions that contained renal masses and 114 regions that did not. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the observers to have significantly greater confidence in detection of renal masses on the delayed scans. The binary data showed the two observers to have a sensitivity of 97% for delayed scans versus 77% (p = .0002) and 89% (p = .027), respectively, for the early scans. For the first observer, early and delayed scans were of equal specificity, but for the second observer, the delayed scans yielded greater specificity (94% versus 85%, p = .024). On the early scans, both observers were significantly more likely to miss a neoplastic lesion than a nonneoplastic lesion. The less experienced of the two observers also tended to have greater difficulty in characterizing the lesions on the early scans. CONCLUSION: Because of the significant risk of missing a renal mass, especially a neoplasm, on early cortical-phase scans, additional delayed scans appear justified when a renal mass is suspected on the basis of other imaging tests or clinical history.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C Walter, M Kruessell, A Gindele, H G Brochhagen, A Gossmann, and P Landwehr Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 696 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Urban and E. K. Fishman Renal Lymphoma: CT Patterns with Emphasis on Helical CT RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 197 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Birnbaum, J. E. Jacobs, C. P. Langlotz, and P. Ramchandani Assessment of a Bolus-tracking Technique in Helical Renal CT to Optimize Nephrographic Phase Imaging Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 87 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text]