AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stabler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stabler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1029-1036, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates

A Stabler, A Baur, R Bartl, R Munker, R Lamerz and MF Reiser
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes infiltration patterns of multiple myeloma in spinal MR imaging and correlates the findings with biopsies, survival rates, and signal intensity measurements in unenhanced and enhanced studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with multiple myeloma and 53 age-matched controls underwent MR imaging of the spine. Twenty-nine patients underwent sagittal T1-weighted spin- echo enhanced imaging and all patients underwent sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo unenhanced and opposed-phase gradient-recalled echo images, and signal intensity measurements were taken. MR imaging was correlated to marrow specimens (n = 40) and a clinical staging system. The probability of survival was also calculated. Finally, we performed qualitative visual evaluation (infiltration pattern, degree of tumor involvement) and a quantitative evaluation (marrow signal intensity ratios, contrast enhancement). RESULTS: Five infiltration patterns were found: normal-appearing marrow with low-grade interstitial infiltration (n = 5), focal (n = 18), diffuse (n = 12), focal and diffuse (n = 13), and salt-and-pepper (n = 5). Infiltration pattern correlated with clinical staging; all patients with normal-appearing and salt-and- pepper patterns were clinically stage I. Diffuse marrow infiltration was assessed by marrow ratios: low-grade infiltration, greater than 2.0; intermediate, 1.0-2.0; highgrade, less than 1.0. Contrast enhancement with a signal intensity increase greater than 40% indicated diffuse infiltration. In the control group, all of whom had no marrow disease, enhancement varied (mean +/- SD, 16% +/- 8.9%) but did not exceed 40%. Marrow involvement on MR images correlated significantly with clinical staging and survival (p < or = .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with opposed gradient-recalled echo sequences and contrast enhancement provided data that allowed us to classify infiltration patterns and to quantify diffuse marrow involvement in multiple myeloma, both of which correlated to clinical staging and biopsy. Also, the MR data was of prognostic value. Therefore, like laboratory parameters, biopsies, and radiographs, MR imaging can be a supporting pillar in staging and planning treatment of patients with multiple myeloma.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Baur-Melnyk, S. Buhmann, C. Becker, S. O. Schoenberg, N. Lang, R. Bartl, and M. F. Reiser
Whole-Body MRI Versus Whole-Body MDCT for Staging of Multiple Myeloma
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1097 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Hillengass, K. Wasser, S. Delorme, F. Kiessling, C. Zechmann, A. Benner, H.-U. Kauczor, A. D. Ho, H. Goldschmidt, and T. M. Moehler
Lumbar Bone Marrow Microcirculation Measurements from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Predictor of Event-Free Survival in Progressive Multiple Myeloma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. A. Moulopoulos, D. Gika, A. Anagnostopoulos, K. Delasalle, D. Weber, R. Alexanian, and M. A. Dimopoulos
Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 1824 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-L. Montazel, M. Divine, E. Lepage, H. Kobeiter, S. Breil, and A. Rahmouni
Normal Spinal Bone Marrow in Adults: Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 703 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Rahmouni, J.-L. Montazel, M. Divine, E. Lepage, K. Belhadj, P. Gaulard, M. Bouanane, M. Golli, and H. Kobeiter
Bone Marrow with Diffuse Tumor Infiltration in Patients with Lymphoproliferative Diseases: Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 710 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Stäbler, A. B. Doma, A. Baur, A. Krüger, and M. F. Reiser
Reactive Bone Marrow Changes in Infectious Spondylitis: Quantitative Assessment with MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 863 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla
MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.