American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 893-896, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse

PK Kleinman, K Nimkin, MR Spevak, SM Rayder, DL Madansky, YA Shelton and MM Patterson
Department of Radiology, Imaging Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the additional yield of a repeat skeletal survey in identifying and dating skeletal injury for cases in which child abuse was strongly suspected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three infants and toddlers strongly suspected of being physically abused on the basis of findings on the initial skeletal survey, other imaging studies, history, or physical examination underwent a follow-up examination approximately 2 weeks after the initial examination. The high-detail imaging system included a single- emulsion, single-screen combination with a low-absorption carbon-fiber cassette. The skeletal survey protocol entailed tightly collimated anteroposterior views of the appendicular skeleton and anteroposterior and lateral views of the axial skeleton. Between the two studies, all children were in Department of Social Services custody or living in a safe home. RESULTS: The follow-up skeletal survey yielded additional information regarding skeletal injury in 14 (61%) of 23 cases. Follow- up study increased the number of definite fractures detected from 70 to 89 (27%) (p = .005). Most of these additional injuries were classic metaphyseal lesions or rib fractures. In 13 of the 70 fractures previously detected, the follow-up skeletal survey also provided important information about the age of those injuries. CONCLUSION: When child abuse is strongly suspected on the basis of the findings on the initial skeletal survey, other imaging studies, history, or physical examination, a follow-up skeletal survey is recommended to provide a through and accurate assessment of osseous injuries.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. D. Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect Evaluation of Suspected Child Physical Abuse Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 119(6): 1232 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Prosser, S. Maguire, S. K. Harrison, M. Mann, J. R. Sibert, A. M. Kemp, and Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group How Old Is This Fracture? Radiologic Dating of Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1282 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Chapman Non-accidental injury Imaging, December 1, 2004; 16(2): 161 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Lonergan, A. M. Baker, M. K. Morey, and S. C. Boos From the Archives of the AFIP: Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 811 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S A Mandelstam, D Cook, M Fitzgerald, M R Ditchfield, and H Carty Complementary use of radiological skeletal survey and bone scintigraphy in detection of bony injuries in suspected child abuse * COMMENTARY Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 387 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A M Kemp Investigating subdural haemorrhage in infants Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2002; 86(2): 98 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M A Barber and J R Sibert Diagnosing physical child abuse: the way forward Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2000; 76(902): 743 - 749. [Full Text]

				Section on Radiology Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 1345 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text]