AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 893-896, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse

PK Kleinman, K Nimkin, MR Spevak, SM Rayder, DL Madansky, YA Shelton and MM Patterson
Department of Radiology, Imaging Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the additional yield of a repeat skeletal survey in identifying and dating skeletal injury for cases in which child abuse was strongly suspected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three infants and toddlers strongly suspected of being physically abused on the basis of findings on the initial skeletal survey, other imaging studies, history, or physical examination underwent a follow-up examination approximately 2 weeks after the initial examination. The high-detail imaging system included a single- emulsion, single-screen combination with a low-absorption carbon-fiber cassette. The skeletal survey protocol entailed tightly collimated anteroposterior views of the appendicular skeleton and anteroposterior and lateral views of the axial skeleton. Between the two studies, all children were in Department of Social Services custody or living in a safe home. RESULTS: The follow-up skeletal survey yielded additional information regarding skeletal injury in 14 (61%) of 23 cases. Follow- up study increased the number of definite fractures detected from 70 to 89 (27%) (p = .005). Most of these additional injuries were classic metaphyseal lesions or rib fractures. In 13 of the 70 fractures previously detected, the follow-up skeletal survey also provided important information about the age of those injuries. CONCLUSION: When child abuse is strongly suspected on the basis of the findings on the initial skeletal survey, other imaging studies, history, or physical examination, a follow-up skeletal survey is recommended to provide a through and accurate assessment of osseous injuries.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
C. S. Greeley
Child Abuse Fatalities: Pattern of Injury
AAP Grand Rounds, September 1, 2009; 22(3): 31 - 31.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. S Radesky and N. F Sugar
Femur fracture in an infant
BMJ, May 13, 2009; 338(may13_2): b1583 - b1583.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Section on Radiology
Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse
Pediatrics, May 1, 2009; 123(5): 1430 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. D. Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
Evaluation of Suspected Child Physical Abuse
Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 119(6): 1232 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Prosser, S. Maguire, S. K. Harrison, M. Mann, J. R. Sibert, A. M. Kemp, and Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group
How Old Is This Fracture? Radiologic Dating of Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1282 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Chapman
Non-accidental injury
Imaging, December 1, 2004; 16(2): 161 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. J. Lonergan, A. M. Baker, M. K. Morey, and S. C. Boos
From the Archives of the AFIP: Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 811 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S A Mandelstam, D Cook, M Fitzgerald, M R Ditchfield, and H Carty
Complementary use of radiological skeletal survey and bone scintigraphy in detection of bony injuries in suspected child abuse * COMMENTARY
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 387 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A M Kemp
Investigating subdural haemorrhage in infants
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2002; 86(2): 98 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M A Barber and J R Sibert
Diagnosing physical child abuse: the way forward
Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2000; 76(902): 743 - 749.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Section on Radiology
Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse
Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 1345 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.