AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laissy, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schouman-Claeys, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laissy, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schouman-Claeys, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 971-975, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Assessment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis: MR venography versus duplex Doppler sonography

JP Laissy, A Cinqualbre, A Loshkajian, MC Henry-Feugeas, B Crestani, C Riquelme and E Schouman-Claeys
Department of Radiology, Hopital Bichat, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the diagnostic value of MR venography and color Doppler sonography in the assessment of deep venous thrombosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: MR venograms and color Doppler examinations were obtained in 37 patients either with suspected deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs or pelvis or with pulmonary embolism. Two-dimensional time-of-flight venography was used for all studies. MR and color Doppler data were collected prospectively and analyzed in a blinded manner. In a subset of 21 patients, MR venography and color Doppler sonography were prospectively compared with contrast- enhanced venography. RESULTS: When compared with contrast-enhanced venography, MR venography was 100% sensitive and 100% specific in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis above the knee. Color Doppler imaging depicted 13 of 15 cases of deep venous thrombosis and 5 of 6 venous examinations that had normal results, yielding a sensitivity and a specificity of 87% and 83%, respectively. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between MR venography and color Doppler sonography were not statistically significant. MR venography was 95% sensitive and 99% specific in detecting the extension of deep venous thrombosis, compared with the 46% sensitivity and 100% specificity of color Doppler sonography (differences in sensitivity, p < .01). MR images showed 29 collateral vessels, whereas only 21 were detected by contrast-enhanced venography (p < .04). CONCLUSION: MR venography seems to be more accurate than color Doppler sonography in detecting the extension of deep venous thrombosis. The positive diagnosis and extent of deep venous thrombosis can be easily detected and monitored by a noninvasive technique such as MR venography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman
Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Li, J. Salanitri, S. Tutton, E. E. Dunkle, J. R. Schneider, J. A. Caprini, L. N. Pierchala, P. M. Jacobs, and R. R. Edelman
Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: Evaluation with Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR Imaging and Dual-Contrast Mechanism--Preliminary Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. S. Shah, A. Kalyn, P. Satodia, M. S. Dunn, B. Parvez, A. Daneman, S. Salem, P. Glanc, A. Ohlsson, and V. Shah
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Heparin Versus Placebo Infusion to Prolong the Usability of Peripherally Placed Percutaneous Central Venous Catheters (PCVCs) in Neonates: The HIP (Heparin Infusion for PCVC) Study
Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e284 - e291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
Radiology Quiz Case 2: Diagnosis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2006; 132(7): 804 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. P. Stannard, A. K. Singhania, R. R. Lopez-Ben, E. R. Anderson, R. C. Farris, D. A. Volgas, G. R. McGwin Jr, and J. E. Alonso
Deep-vein thrombosis in high-energy skeletal trauma despite thromboprophylaxis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2005; 87-B(7): 965 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. Kanne and T. A. Lalani
Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-15 - I-21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. D. Stein, P. K. Woodard, R. D. Hull, F. Kayali, J. G. Weg, R. E. Olson, and S. E. Fowler
Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: An In-depth Review
Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2324 - 2328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. H. B. Yoo, S. A. R. de Paiva, L. V. d. A. Silveira, and T. T. Queluz
Logistic Regression Analysis of Potential Prognostic Factors for Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 813 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J.-B. Stern, M. Abehsera, D. Grenet, S. Friard, L.-J. Couderc, A. Scherrer, and M. Stern
Detection of Pelvic Vein Thrombosis by Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Normal Lower Limb Compression Ultrasonography*
Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 115 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
L. M. Wolpert, O. Rahmani, B. Stein, J. J. Gallagher, and A. D. Drezner
Magnetic Resonance Venography in the Diagnosis and Management of May-Thurner Syndrome
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2002; 36(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. E. Spritzer, M. A. Arata, and K. S. Freed
Isolated Pelvic Deep Venous Thrombosis: Relative Frequency as Detected with MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
B. G. Birdwell, G. E. Raskob, T. L. Whitsett, S. S. Durica, P. C. Comp, J. N. George, T. L. Tytle, W. L. Owen, and P. A. McKee
Predictive Value of Compression Ultrasonography for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients: Clinical Implications of the Site of Vein Noncompressibility
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 309 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. Tapson
The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.