American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1261-1265, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old

PC Stomper, DJ D'Souza, PA DiNitto and MA Arredondo
Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo 14263, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the frequency and distribution of dense mammograms. Factors that may affect parenchymal density of breasts among the diverse age groups of women who undergo mammography were also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms of 1353 women between 25 and 79 years old who were grouped in 5-year age cohorts were reviewed. Breast density and the presence of benign calcifications were analyzed. RESULTS: Parenchymal density on mammograms decreased progressively in the patient cohorts 25-29 years old through 75-79 years old (Spearman correlation, p < .01). In the cohort of 25- through 29-year-old patients, 38% had predominantly (> 50%) fatty breasts. In the cohort of 75- through 79-year-old patients, 76% had predominantly fatty breasts. Increased parenchymal density mammograms were more common in women who had smaller breasts, had had fewer than two pregnancies, and underwent hormone replacement (p < .01). Forty-nine percent of women 50-79 years old undergoing hormone replacement had predominantly dense breasts, a percentage similar to that (48%) of the patient cohort of women 40-44 years old. Prevalence of benign calcifications also increased with age, from 8% at ages 25-29 to 86% at ages 75-79 (p < .01). CONCLUSION: In our study, a significant percentage (38%) of women who were 25-39 years old had predominantly fatty breast tissue that should not impede selective mammographic screening or diagnostic efforts in this age group.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack, E. B. Mendelson, D. Lehrer, M. Bohm-Velez, E. D. Pisano, R. A. Jong, W. P. Evans, M. J. Morton, et al. Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer JAMA, May 14, 2008; 299(18): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Graf, T. H. Helbich, G. Hopf, C. Graf, and E. A. Sickles Probably Benign Breast Masses at US: Is Follow-up an Acceptable Alternative to Biopsy? Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 87 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Kopans Bias in the Medical Journals: A Commentary Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 176 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. McDonald, D. Saslow, and M. H. Alciati Performance and Reporting of Clinical Breast Examination: A Review of the Literature CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2004; 54(6): 345 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Roubidoux, J. E. Bailey, L. A. Wray, and M. A. Helvie Invasive Cancers Detected after Breast Cancer Screening Yielded a Negative Result: Relationship of Mammographic Density to Tumor Prognostic Factors Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, B. Stillwater, P. Novotny, and J. Sloan Relationship of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns to Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Smoking in Alaska Native Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1081 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Berg Rationale for a Trial of Screening Breast Ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1225 - 1228. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hlawatsch, A. Teifke, M. Schmidt, and M. Thelen Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer: Sonography Versus MR Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1493 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. A. Gilhuijs, E. E. Deurloo, S. H. Muller, J. L. Peterse, and L. J. Schultze Kool Breast MR Imaging in Women at Increased Lifetime Risk of Breast Cancer: Clinical System for Computerized Assessment of Breast Lesions—Initial Results Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 907 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Stoler, C. C. Stewart, and P. C. Stomper Breast Epithelium Procurement from Stereotactic Core Biopsy Washings: Flow Cytometry-sorted Cell Count Analysis Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Yankaskas, R. J. Cleveland, M. J. Schell, and R. Kozar Association of Recall Rates with Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Values of Screening Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Freedman, J. S. Martin, J. O'Gorman, S. Eckert, M. E. Lippman, S.-C. B. Lo, E. L. Walls, and J. Zeng Digitized Mammography: a Clinical Trial of Postmenopausal Women Randomly Assigned to Receive Raloxifene, Estrogen, or Placebo J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Feig Age-related Accuracy of Screening Mammography: How Should It Be Measured? Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 633 - 640. [Full Text]

				M. B. Barton, R. Harris, and S. W. Fletcher Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How? JAMA, October 6, 1999; 282(13): 1270 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]