AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodenko, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Flamig, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodenko, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Flamig, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1415-1419, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology

GN Rodenko, SE Harms, JM Pruneda, RS Farrell Jr, WP Evans, DS Copit, PA Krakos and DP Flamig
Department of Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the use of MR imaging in preoperative staging and characterization of lobular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging studies and mammographic studies in 20 patients with infiltrating lobular carcinoma were evaluated and correlated with pathology findings on serially sectioned tissue. The MR images and mammograms were reviewed retrospectively by three independent examiners unaware of the clinical, imaging, and pathology findings. RESULTS: The extent of disease found pathologically correlated with that predicted by MR imaging studies in 85% of patients, compared with a 32% correlation (p < .0001) with mammographic studies. Interobserver agreement on lesion morphology and extent of disease was higher for MR imaging (91% and 100%, respectively) than for mammography (64% and 91%, respectively). The retrospective MR readings did not differ from the prospective reports. No false-positive lymphadenopathy was interpreted on MR imaging. Lymph nodes having metastatic lobular carcinoma on the pathology examination were missed on MR imaging in four patients. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is significantly more accurate than mammography in determining the extent of disease and characterizing the morphology of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. MR imaging may play a role in preoperative planning, especially when breast conservation is being considered.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Orel
Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
N. Biglia, L. Mariani, L. Sgro, P. Mininanni, G. Moggio, and P. Sismondi
Increased incidence of lobular breast cancer in women treated with hormone replacement therapy: implications for diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 549 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. K. Shah, S. K. Shah, and K. V. Greatrex
Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Imaging: A Primer for the Primary Care Physician
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 478 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Meisamy, P. J. Bolan, E. H. Baker, M. G. Pollema, C. T. Le, F. Kelcz, M. C. Lechner, B. A. Luikens, R. A. Carlson, K. R. Brandt, et al.
Adding in Vivo Quantitative 1H MR Spectroscopy to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast MR Imaging: Preliminary Results of Observer Performance Study at 4.0 T
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Newman and H. M. Kuerer
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1685 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Lee, S. G. Orel, B. J. Czerniecki, L. J. Solin, and M. D. Schnall
MRI Before Reexcision Surgery in Patients with Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M.L. Quan, L. Sclafani, A.S. Heerdt, J.V. Fey, E.A. Morris, and P.I. Borgen
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Unsuspected Disease in Patients With Invasive Lobular Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, C. M. Kim, J. B. Kaplan, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, K. J. Van Zee, and D. D. Dershaw
MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Qayyum, R. L. Birdwell, B. L. Daniel, K. W. Nowels, S. S. Jeffrey, T. A. Agoston, and R. J. Herfkens
MR Imaging Features of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Histopathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1227 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill and W. A. Berg
Case 39: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 132 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Kim, E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. J. Ballon, L. R. L. Trenta, O. Hadar, A. Abramson, and D. D. Dershaw
Observer Variability and Applicability of BI-RADS Terminology for Breast MR Imaging: Invasive Carcinomas as Focal Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 551 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. P. Weinstein, S. G. Orel, R. Heller, C. Reynolds, B. Czerniecki, L. J. Solin, and M. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. A. Morris, L. H. Schwartz, M. B. Drotman, S. J. Kim, L. K. Tan, L. Liberman, A. F. Abramson, K. J. Van Zee, and D. D. Dershaw
Evaluation of Pectoralis Major Muscle in Patients with Posterior Breast Tumors on Breast MR Images: Early Experience1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel, S. P. Weinstein, M. D. Schnall, C. A. Reynolds, L. M. Schuchter, D. L. Fraker, and L. J. Solin
Breast MR Imaging in Patients with Axillary Node Metastases and Unknown Primary Malignancy
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.