AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by deSouza, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krausz, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by deSouza, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krausz, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1465-1471, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence

NM deSouza, R Puni, A Zbar, DJ Gilderdale, GA Coutts and T Krausz
Robert Steiner Magnetic Resonance Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to correlate the components of the normal female anal sphincter seen on high-resolution MR images with the in vitro anatomy and to describe the change in appearances of these components in multiparous women with fecal incontinence. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten asymptomatic female volunteers (32-72 years old; mean, 54 years old) and 22 women with fecal incontinence were studied. In six patients (26-68 years old; mean, 49 years old) fecal incontinence began immediately after childbirth; in the remaining 16 patients (45-77 years old; mean, 58 years old) fecal incontinence developed 15- 30 years after childbirth. In the latter group of patients, terminal motor latencies of the pudendal nerve were measured. Imaging was done on a 0.5-T Picker Asset unit and on a 1.0-T Picker HPQ unit. A saddle geometry endoanal receiver coil was used for all imaging. T1-weighted spin-echo (720-820/20 [range of TR/TE]), T2-weighted spin-echo (2500/80 [TR/TE]), fast spin-echo (4500/96 [TR/ effective TE]), and short inversion time inversion recovery (2500/80 [TR/TE]; inversion time, 107 msec) MR images were obtained in transverse, coronal oblique, and sagittal planes. Images were assessed for integrity of the sphincter components. A nonpaired separate-variance t test was used to compare thickness of individual muscle components between patients with delayed- onset fecal incontinence and asymptomatic age-matched volunteers. Degree of muscle atrophy was correlated with degree of delay in the terminal motor latency of the pudendal nerve. RESULTS: The high resolution obtained with an endoanal coil allowed differentiation of the various muscle components of the anal sphincter complex. The internal sphincter was seen as a ring of homogeneously high signal intensity with a low-signal-intensity rim that was rich in collagen and contained neurovascular bundles. The external anal sphincter, which had low signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, was shown as three components: subcutaneous, superficial, and deep. In six patients who had fecal incontinence that began immediately after childbirth, endoanal MR imaging revealed the site and extent of a tear. All tears were confirmed at surgery. In the 16 patients who had fecal incontinence that began several years after childbirth, atrophy of the external sphincter was revealed in all cases in the superficial and deep components. The internal sphincter remained normal. However, we found that the degree of atrophy of individual components of the external sphincter did not correlate with the degree of delay in pudendal nerve conduction. CONCLUSION: MR imaging with an endoanal coil reveals the integrity and bulk of individual muscle components of the anal sphincter in multiparous women with fecal incontinence.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. P. Terra, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, V. P. M. van der Hulst, M. Deutekom, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. C. Dobben, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. Stoker
MRI in Evaluating Atrophy of the External Anal Sphincter in Patients with Fecal Incontinence
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 991 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Frudinger, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, A. B. Price, M. A. Kamm, and R. Winter
Female Anal Sphincter: Age-related Differences in Asymptomatic Volunteers with High-Frequency Endoanal US
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. H. Beets-Tan, G. L. Morren, G. L. Beets, A. G. H. Kessels, K. el Naggar, E. Lemaire, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven
Measurement of Anal Sphincter Muscles: Endoanal US, Endoanal MR Imaging, or Phased-Array MR Imaging? A Study with Healthy Volunteers
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 81 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Stoker, S. Halligan, and C. I. Bartram
Pelvic Floor Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 621 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Rociu, J. Stoker, M. J. C. Eijkemans, and J. S. Laméris
Normal Anal Sphincter Anatomy and Age- and Sex-related Variations at High-Spatial-Resolution Endoanal MR Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Malouf, A. B. Williams, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, S. Dhillon, and M. A. Kamm
Prospective Assessment of Accuracy of Endoanal MR Imaging and Endosonography in Patients with Fecal Incontinence
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 741 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Rociu, J. Stoker, M. J. C. Eijkemans, W. R. Schouten, and J. S. Laméris
Fecal Incontinence: Endoanal US versus Endoanal MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.