AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dagirmanjian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Modic, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dagirmanjian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Modic, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1539-1543, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of vertebral osteomyelitis revisited

A Dagirmanjian, J Schils, M McHenry and MT Modic
Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to reevaluate previously reported MR imaging findings for vertebral osteomyelitis that include decreased signal intensity in the disk and adjacent vertebral bodies on T1-weighted images, increased signal intensity in the disk and adjacent vertebral bodies on T2-weighted images, loss of endplate definition on T1-weighted images, and contrast enhancement of the disk, adjacent vertebral bodies, and involved paraspinal and epidural soft tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records, radiographs, and MR scans of 37 patients with vertebral osteomyelitis with 41 levels of involvement were reviewed for agreement with reported MR imaging findings. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the levels (39/41) showed decreased vertebral body signal intensity on T1-weighted images; 95% (39/41) had loss of endplate definition; 95% (37/39) had increased disk signal intensity on T2-weighted images; and 56% (22/39) had increased vertebral body signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Eighty-five percent of the levels (35/41) and 84% of patients (31/37) had both signal intensity changes of the vertebral body on T1-weighted images and signal intensity changes of the disk on T1-and T2-weighted images. Only 46% of the levels (19/41) and 49% of patients (18/37) had both vertebral body and disk changes on T1- and T2-weighted images. Contrast enhancement of the disk and vertebral body was seen in 94% of patients (17/18). Ring enhancement of paraspinal and epidural processes was found to correlate at surgery with abscess, and homogeneous enhancement was found to correlate with phlegmon. CONCLUSION: Hypointense signal intensity in the vertebral body on T1-weighted images, abnormal disk signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images, and contrast enhancement are the findings that indicate spinal infection most reliably.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.Y. Hsu, C.W. Yu, M.Z. Wu, B.B. Chen, K.M. Huang, and T.T.F. Shih
Unusual Manifestations of Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Intraosseous Lesions Mimicking Metastases
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
P. Sendi, T. Bregenzer, and W. Zimmerli
Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice
QJM, January 1, 2008; 101(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. P. Dormans and L. Moroz
Infection and Tumors of the Spine in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(suppl_1): 79 - 97.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Teh, A Imam, and C Watts
Imaging of back pain
Imaging, December 1, 2005; 17(3): 171 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. P. Ledermann, M. E. Schweitzer, W. B. Morrison, and J. A. Carrino
MR Imaging Findings in Spinal Infections: Rules or Myths?
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 506 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. D. M. Stumpe, M. Zanetti, D. Weishaupt, J. Hodler, N. Boos, and G. K. von Schulthess
FDG Positron Emission Tomography for Differentiation of Degenerative and Infectious Endplate Abnormalities in the Lumbar Spine Detected on MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1151 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. S. Chew and M. J. Kline
Diagnostic Yield of CT-guided Percutaneous Aspiration Procedures in Suspected Spontaneous Infectious Diskitis
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. L. Williams, M. B. Fukui, C. Cidis Meltzer, A. Swarnkar, D. W. Johnson, and W. Welch
Fungal Spinal Osteomyelitis in the Immunocompromised Patient: MR Findings in Three Cases
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 1999; 20(3): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.