AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosol, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosol, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 167, 1545-1549, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Vertebral morphometry derived from digital images

MS Rosol, GL Cohen, EF Halpern, FS Chew, SV Kattapuram, WE Palmer, DE Dupuy and DI Rosenthal
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We describe a method for capturing measurement data directly from digitized images using specialized software and high-resolution workstations. We have evaluated the reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility of this method in an international clinical trial involving vertebral morphometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accuracy was determined using clinical radiographs measured with vernier calipers and a film phantom. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were assessed, and longitudinal reproducibility was evaluated. As part of the trial, spinal radiographs were collected from more than 200 international health care facilities and digitized at four screening centers. Digitized images were stored and sent to our central facility for morphometry and archiving. Timeliness and variability of the process were tracked. RESULTS: Relative accuracy was nearly 100%. Correlation with clinical measurements was high (r = .96; p < .05). The mean coefficient of variation for interobserver variability was 2%. Intraobserver variation was 3-5%. The coefficient of variation for longitudinal reproducibility ranged from 4% to 6%. After 9 months of operation, our trial included 9494 patients. Of approximately 36,000 radiographs, 98% passed quality review. Only 1% of vertebral levels were not measurable. Hardware and software problems were minimal. CONCLUSION: The use of digitized images for morphometry is accurate, reproducible, and convenient. When applied to a large-scale clinical trial, it offers unique advantages that may justify the cost and complexity that exceed those of conventional radiographs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.