American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 261-266, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries

JC Bass, MR Prince, FJ Londy and TL Chenevert
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, University Hospital, Ann Arbor 48109-0030, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of gadolinium chelates on image quality in phase-contrast MR angiography of renal arteries in patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, axial three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries was obtained on a 1.5-T MR imaging system before and after administration of gadolinium contrast agent. The improvement in distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio after enhancement was measured and correlated with patient age, serum creatinine level, clinical estimation of renal artery flow, and the imaging parameter flip angle. RESULTS: On average, the distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio increased 2.2-fold after gadolinium administration (p < .001). The increase was greatest in patients more than 60 years old (3.1-fold; p < .001) and in patients with serum creatinine levels greater than 3.0 mg/dl (4.3-fold; p < .01). After enhancement, we found an apparent increase in renal artery diameter (3.5 +/- 1.1 mm before enhancement versus 4.8 +/- 1.4 mm after enhancement [mean +/- SD; p < .001]). We believe this increase reflects improved visualization of slow blood flow along the artery wall. Although the visualization of renal arteries was better in most patients after enhancement, two patients had poorer image quality after enhancement because of increased venous signal obscuring the arteries. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium administration significantly increases distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio on three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in most patients. The signal-to-noise ratio improvement is greatest in older patients and in patients with impaired renal function. However, in some cases, increased venous signal may obscure arteries.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. de Haan, J. M.A. van Engelshoven, A. J.H.M. Houben, D. W. Kaandorp, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, and P. W. de Leeuw Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification in Renal Arteries: Comparison With 133Xenon Washout Measurements Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 114 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Thurnher, A. Capelastegui, F. H. Del Olmo, R. F. Dondelinger, C. Gervás, A. G. Jassoy, P. Keto, C. Loewe, C. N. Ludman, L. Marti-Bonmati, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Single- versus Triple-Dose Gadodiamide Injection- enhanced MR Angiography of the Abdomen: A Phase III Double-Blind Multicenter Study Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Q. Dong, S. O. Schoenberg, R. C. Carlos, M. Neimatallah, K. J. Cho, D. M. Williams, S. N. Kazanjian, and M. R. Prince Diagnosis of Renal Vascular Disease with MR Angiography RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1535 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]