AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 379-385, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging evaluation with a transrectal surface coil of local recurrence of prostatic cancer in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy

JM Silverman and TL Krebs
Department of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of transrectal surface coil MR imaging to reveal local recurrence of malignancy in men who have had radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed prospective analysis of 41 men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (range of time since surgery, 8 months to 5 years; mean, 26 months), 35 of whom had clinical suspicion of recurrent prostatic cancer and the remaining six of whom had no clinical evidence of recurrent prostatic cancer (controls). Our imaging used a transrectal surface coil on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Sagittal and axial fat-saturated T2-weighted fast spin-echo as well as axial T1- weighted unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images of the prostatic bed were acquired in all patients. Thirty-one of the 35 men with clinical suspicion of recurrent prostatic cancer had elevated prostate- specific antigen (PSA) levels (> or = 0.4 ng/ml), and 22 of these 31 men had a palpable prostatic bed module or induration. The four of 35 men with clinical suspicion of recurrent prostatic cancer who had PSA levels less than 0.4 ng/ml had a palpable prostatic bed nodule or induration. Transrectal biopsy of the prostatic bed was directed by digital palpation or transrectal sonography in all 35 men with clinical suspicion of recurrent malignancy. RESULTS: Thirty-one of the 35 men who had clinical suspicion of local recurrence of prostatic cancer had a soft-tissue nodule revealed in the prostatic bed by transrectal surface coil MR imaging. Compared with the adjacent muscle, all nodules were isointense on the T1-weighted images, hyperintense on the T2- weighted images, and enhanced with gadolinium administration. The 22 patients who had an abnormal MR scan and a palpable nodule or induration and the nine patients with elevated PSA levels, no palpable abnormality, and an abnormality revealed by MR imaging underwent transrectal biopsy; all had recurrent prostatic cancer proven by histology in the four patients with a palpable prostatic bed nodule or induration and normal PSA levels, MR imaging showed no distinct soft- tissue nodule or area of enhancement in the prostatic bed; transrectal biopsy of the palpable nodule or induration yielded fibrosis but no malignancy in all four patients. In the six control patients with no clinical evidence of local recurrence, MR imaging revealed no evidence of recurrent malignancy; all six control patients continue to have no clinical evidence of recurrent prostatic cancer with a minimum follow- up of 22 months. Thus, the sensitivity of MR imaging in revealing local recurrence of prostatic cancer was 100% (95% confidence interval = 89- 100%), and the specificity also was 100% (95% confidence interval = 69- 100%). The kappa coefficient was 1.0 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with a transrectal surface coil is a useful imaging tool to evaluate men who have undergone radical prostatectomy and are suspected of having local recurrence of malignancy in the prostatic bed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Casciani, E. Polettini, E. Carmenini, I. Floriani, G. Masselli, L. Bertini, and G. F. Gualdi
Endorectal and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1187 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Kundra, P. M. Silverman, S. F. Matin, and H. Choi
Imaging in Oncology from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 830 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino
Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Sella, L. H. Schwartz, and H. Hricak
Retained Seminal Vesicles After Radical Prostatectomy: Frequency, MRI Characteristics, and Clinical Relevance
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 539 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Schoder, K. Herrmann, M. Gonen, H. Hricak, S. Eberhard, P. Scardino, H. I. Scher, and S. M. Larson
2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Disease in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4761 - 4769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Sella, L. H. Schwartz, P. W. Swindle, C. N. Onyebuchi, P. T. Scardino, H. I. Scher, and H. Hricak
Suspected Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: Endorectal Coil MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Picchio, C. Landoni, C. Messa, L. Gianolli, M. Matarrese, F. De Cobelli, A. D. Maschio, and F. Fazio
Positive [11C]Choline and Negative [18F]FDG with Positron Emission Tomography in Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 482 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. Leventis, S. F. Shariat, and K. M. Slawin
Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation of US Features with Prostatic Fossa Biopsy Findings
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 432 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. K. Leventis, S. F. Shariat, M. W. Kattan, E. B. Butler, T. M. Wheeler, and K. M. Slawin
Prediction of Response to Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2001; 19(4): 1030 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.