AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaste, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaste, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 1001-1003, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Effect of helical CT on the frequency of sedation in pediatric patients

SC Kaste, CW Young, TP Holmes and DK Baker
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-2794, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the use of sedation for helical CT examination of pediatric patients with that for conventional CT studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared two 4-month periods of CT examinations that differed only in that conventional CT was routinely used in one period and helical CT was exclusively used in the other period. For these two periods, we compared the type and number of CT examinations, the sedation used (if any), and the age of patients who required sedation. RESULTS: We performed 1055 conventional CT examinations in 762 pediatric cancer patients. Of the 264 children who were 8 years old or younger, 107 had been sedated. In comparison, 1195 helical CT examinations were performed on 838 patients: of the 246 children 8 years old or younger, 51 received sedation. For both study groups, the mean and median age of the patients was 4 years old. The mean age of patients requiring sedation was 21 (conventional CT) or 20 months (helical CT); the median age of patients who required sedation was 2 years old for both study groups. Patients who were 8 years old or younger and who underwent helical CT required sedation 49% less frequently than such patients who underwent conventional CT. The most dramatic reduction occurred among patients who were 3 years old or younger (p < or = .004). CONCLUSION: Use of helical CT reduced the need for sedation among our pediatric patients. Fewer sedations may reduce the risk of complications, decrease disruption of the patient's normal daily activities, and improve patient throughout. The associated savings in personnel time and pharmaceutical costs can be redistributed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Siegel
Multiplanar and Three-dimensional Multi-Detector Row CT of Thoracic Vessels and Airways in the Pediatric Population
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 641 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas
Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. N. Pappas, L. F. Donnelly, and D. P. Frush
Reduced Frequency of Sedation of Young Children with Multisection Helical CT
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 897 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.