AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seltzer, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seltzer, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 889-893, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting

SE Seltzer, P Kelly, DF Adams, BF Chiango, MA Viera, E Fener, S Hooton, S Bannon- Rohrbach, CD Healy, PM Doubilet and BL Holman
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether total quality management (TQM) techniques that had proved successful in a pilot study in one departmental section of a teaching hospital could be generalized for use by the entire radiology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each departmental section developed interventions to improve its report turnaround time. These interventions were tailored to practice style and habits of each section. Commonly used interventions included electronic signature from the radiologist's home, a report- signing buddy system, elimination of a trainee signature requirement, accelerated transcription, structured reports, faster film delivery to reading desks, and training about the importance of radiology reports for clinical decision making. Specialized programs included computerized form-driven reporting and reports generated directly by computer voice recognition of radiologists' dictation. Our radiology information system provided data on each step in the reporting process. RESULTS: The TQM approach produced significant improvements in departmental total report turnaround time (-55%; p = .001), transcription time (-80%; p = .003), and signature time (-68%; p = .0004). Each section achieved significant gains. The sonography section initiated a computerized, form-driven reporting system and outperformed the rest of the department. CONCLUSIONS: TQM techniques can be expanded and generalized for department-wide projects in teaching hospitals.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. R. Ramaswamy, G. Chaljub, O. Esch, D. D. Fanning, and E. vanSonnenberg
Continuous Speech Recognition in MR Imaging Reporting: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Impact
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.