American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 913-918, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive patients

LT Bui-Mansfield, RA Youngberg, W Warme, JD Pitcher and PL Nguyen
Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431- 5000, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the potential cost savings of prearthroscopic knee MR imaging examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved 50 consecutive patients. The patients met the surgical-indications-for-monitoring-appropriateness criteria for knee arthroscopy and underwent MR imaging of the knee before arthroscopy. For all patients, we compared MR imaging and arthroscopic findings. On the basis of a cost of $1000 for each MR imaging examination and $4000 for each diagnostic arthroscopy, we decided that cost-effective MR imaging would require 25% true negativity. RESULTS: The respective sensitivities and specificities of MR imaging of the knee were 100% and 90% for revealing anterior cruciate ligament interruption, 100% and 84% for revealing posterior cruciate ligament tears, 90% and 97% for revealing medial meniscal tears, 60% and 100% for revealing lateral meniscal tears, and 94% and 93% for revealing composite injury (one or more of these abnormalities). With MR imaging examinations obtained before surgery, we found 21 (42%) of 50 arthroscopies to be unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Despite stringent clinical criteria used in selecting patients for arthroscopy, 42% of our patients could have been spared surgery on the basis of the anatomy revealed by MR imaging. Our study indicates that MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee can produce a savings of as much as $680 per MR imaging examination performed on the knee.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. KOPLAS, J. SCHILS, and M. SUNDARAM The painful knee: Choosing thea right imaging test Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, May 1, 2008; 75(5): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Crawford, G. Walley, S. Bridgman, and N. Maffulli Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2007; 84(1): 5 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. J. Vincken, A. P. M. ter Braak, A. R. van Erkel, E. G. Coerkamp, T. P. W. de Rooy, S. de Lange, W. M. C. Mallens, L. N. J. E. M. Coene, R. M. Bloem, P. A. van Luijt, et al. MR Imaging: Effectiveness and Costs at Triage of Patients with Nonacute Knee Symptoms Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 85 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. G. Oei, J. J. Nikken, A. C. M. Verstijnen, A. Z. Ginai, and M. G. Myriam Hunink MR Imaging of the Menisci and Cruciate Ligaments: A Systematic Review Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 837 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. J. Vincken, B. P. M. ter Braak, A. R. van Erkell, T. P. W. de Rooy, W. M. C. Mallens, W. Post, and J. L. Bloem Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Selection of Patients for Arthroscopy of the Knee Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 739 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]