American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 1449-1454, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique

Y Yamashita, Y Abe, Y Tang, J Urata, S Sumi and M Takahashi
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the in vitro and clinical value of two-dimensional multislice breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a single-shot projection technique using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined 108 patients with pancreaticobiliary diseases, using breath-hold MRCP and a half-Fourier acquisition single- shot turbo spin-echo sequence on a 1.5-T MR unit with a body phased- array coil. Two data acquisition techniques were employed: multislice acquisition postprocessed by maximum intensity projection (MIP) (multislice technique) and single-shot projection with a thick slice (projection technique). In the multislice technique, nine contiguous slices were obtained with a thickness of 5 mm (acquisition time. 18 sec). In the projection technique, a single slice was obtained with a thickness of 30, 50, or 70 mm (acquisition time. 2 sec). Contrast-to- noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and the liver as well as detectability of normal structures and diseases were compared for these two acquisition techniques. In the multislice technique, source images were also evaluated. ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography images were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Most of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct was revealed on 54% and 100% of the projection images, respectively, and on 35% and 98% of the MIP images, respectively, CNR was significantly higher with the multislice technique than with the projection technique (p < .01). With the projection technique, CNR decreased as slice thickness increased. Dilatation and occlusion of the pancreaticobiliary tree were equally well revealed by the two imaging techniques. However, abnormalities in the periampullary region and anomalies in the pancreaticobiliary tree were more clearly seen on projection images than on MIP images (p < .05). Stones in the common bile duct, gallbladder, or intrahepatic bile duct were best seen on source images acquired by the multislice technique (83% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: Because of the absence of misregistration and the speed of image acquisition, breath-hold single- shot MRCP using the projection technique with a slice thickness of 30 or 50 mm consistently revealed the pancreaticobiliary tree and periampullary region with an acceptable CNR. Stones in the bile duct were best seen on the source images acquired by the MIP technique.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Lim, M.-J. Kim, S. Myoung, M.-S. Park, J.-Y. Choi, J.-S. Choi, and S. I. Kim MR Cholangiography for Evaluation of Hilar Branching Anatomy in Transplantation of the Right Hepatic Lobe from a Living Donor Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 537 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zhang, G. M. Israel, E. M. Hecht, G. A. Krinsky, J. S. Babb, and V. S. Lee Isotropic 3D T2-Weighted MR Cholangiopancreatography with Parallel Imaging: Feasibility Study. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1564 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sodickson, K. J. Mortele, M. A. Barish, K. H. Zou, S. Thibodeau, and C. M. C. Tempany Three-dimensional Fast-Recovery Fast Spin-Echo MRCP: Comparison with Two-dimensional Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Techniques Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 549 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Matos, O. Cappeliez, C. Winant, E. Coppens, J. Deviere, and T. Metens MR Imaging of the Pancreas: A Pictorial Tour RadioGraphics, January 1, 2002; 22(1): e2 - e2. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Irie, H. Honda, T. Kuroiwa, K. Yoshimitsu, H. Aibe, K. Shinozaki, and K. Masuda Pitfalls in MR Cholangiopancreatographic Interpretation RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 23 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Soto, O. Alvarez, F. Munera, S. M. Velez, J. Valencia, and N. Ramirez Diagnosing Bile Duct Stones: Comparison of Unenhanced Helical CT, Oral Contrast-Enhanced CT Cholangiography, and MR Cholangiography Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1127 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hirao, A. Miyazaki, T. Fujimoto, I. Isomoto, and K. Hayashi Evaluation of Aberrant Bile Ducts Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Helical CT Cholangiography Versus MR Cholangiography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 713 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. I. Goldberg and A. R. Margulis Gastrointestinal Radiology in the United States: An Overview of the Past 50 Years Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. T. Sica, J. Braver, M. J. Cooney, F. H. Miller, J. L. Chai, and D. F. Adams Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with MR Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Pancreatitis Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 605 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Fulcher, M. A. Turner, and G. W. Capps MR Cholangiography: Technical Advances and Clinical Applications RadioGraphics, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 25 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Fukukura, F. Fujiyoshi, M. Sasaki, and M. Nakajo Pancreatic Duct: Morphologic Evaluation with MR Cholangiopancreatography after Secretin Stimulation Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]