AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crow, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crow, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 1603-1608, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Accuracy of prenatal sonography for detecting circumvallate placenta

RD Harris, WA Wells, WC Black, JD Chertoff, SP Poplack, SK Sargent and HC Crow
Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We determined the accuracy of prenatal sonography for detecting placental circumvallation, a placental abnormality associated with increased fetal morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62 healthy pregnant (range, 18-36 weeks) patients with focused placental sonography for detection of morphologic abnormality using the published criteria for circumvallate placenta (irregular edge, uplifted margin, or placental sheet or shelf). Placental marginal sonograms were taken at 30 degrees intervals around the entire placental margin. Five experienced sonologists who were unaware of the pathologic findings independently reviewed the placental images and graded the placentas from 1 (definitely normal) to 5 (definitely circumvallate). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve were calculated for each reader. Gross and microscopic pathology was used as the gold standard for all cases. RESULTS: In the 62 patients, sonography revealed 49 normal placentas (79%), 12 partially circumvallate placentas (19%), and one completely circumvallate placenta (2%). ROC curves for the reviewers resulted in values for area under the curve ranging from .39 to .58. The sonologist who achieved the highest value for the area under the curve classified the 13 cases of proven circumvallation as one case of definite circumvallation, four cases as uncertain or equivocal, and eight cases as probably or definitely normal placentas. Of the normal placentas, 35% were graded as probably or definitely circumvallate by at least one sonologist. All sonologists misgraded the case of complete circumvallation as normal. CONCLUSION: Focused placental sonograms interpreted by experienced sonologists fail to detect the placental edge abnormality in most cases of circumvallation. In our study, 17 of 49 normal placentas were diagnosed as probably or definitely circumvallate by one or more observers. Our sonologists' interpretations of sonograms showed that complete circumvallation was difficult to assess. Although our study had a limited number of patients, the accuracy of sonography of the placenta for revealing circumvallation appears to be limited.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.