AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rand, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, C. E., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Rand, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 11-14, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?

CE Kahn Jr, TA Michalski, SJ Erickson, WD Foley, AZ Krasnow, RP Lofgren, FA Quiroz and SD Rand
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We explored the agreement among radiologists in their evaluation of the appropriateness of individual requests for imaging procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 318 noninterventional CT, sonographic, MR imaging, and nuclear medicine procedures ordered at a general internal medicine clinic during 8 months in 1995. Five subspecialty radiologists used data from the radiology request from and clinic notes to independently rate the appropriateness of each requested imaging procedure on a four-point scale. The radiologists were unaware of the results achieved by each procedure. Each case was reviewed by at least three radiologists, of whom at least one had relevant subspecialty expertise. Agreement among radiologists was analyzed using Cohen's kappa statistic and weighted kappa statistics and Cronbach's alpha statistic. RESULTS: Nonchance agreement (kappa) was .19 +/- .05; weighted kappa was .24 +/- .05. Interrater agreement was significantly greater than that expected from chance alone (p < .01). The composite score, defined as the average of the radiologists' scores for each case, showed moderate reliability, as evidenced by a value for Cronbach's alpha of 70. CONCLUSION: In the absence of explicit criteria, we found modest but statistically significant agreement among radiologists about the appropriateness of individual requests for imaging procedures. The disagreement among radiologists highlights the importance of developing well-reasoned, explicit criteria by which to judge the appropriateness of diagnostic radiology procedures. Further study is needed to elucidate the relationship between appropriateness and actual patient outcomes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Levy, A. Blachar, L. Goldstein, I. Paz, S. Olsha, E. Atar, A. Goldberg, and Y. B. Dayan
Nonradiologist Utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria in a Preauthorization Center for MRI Requests: Applicability and Effects
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 855 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani
Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. Tjahjono and C. E. Kahn Jr
Promoting the Online Use of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1673 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.