AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rieumont, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Waltman, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rieumont, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Waltman, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 39-44, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

MJ Rieumont, JA Kaufman, SC Geller, EK Yucel, RP Cambria, LS Fang, H Bazari and AC Waltman
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare dynamic gadolinium- enhanced three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR angiography with conventional arteriography in the evaluation of proximal renal artery stenosis (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR angiography and conventional arteriographic examinations of 30 patients evaluated for RAS were analyzed retrospectively. Three-dimensional MR angiography was performed with an RF spoiled gradient-recalled imaging sequence acquired during the dynamic i.v. injection of gadolinium (0.2-0.3 mmol/kg), MR data and conventional arteriograms were independently evaluated for the number and location of renal arteries and the degree and location of stenoses. The patients had a mean age of 70 years old and a mean serum creatinine level of 2.9 mg/dl, reflecting a population in whom atherosclerotic RAS was the primary concern. RESULTS: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography revealed 100% of main renal arteries. For RAS of 50% or greater occlusion, the technique was 100% sensitive and 71% specific; the negative predictive value was 100%. The technique was 100% sensitive and 71% specific for RAS of 75% or greater occlusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR angiography has a high sensitivity for revealing proximal RAS and is a quick and reliable technique for obtaining helpful anatomic information.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. B. Stafford, M. Sabati, M. J. Haakstad, H. Mahallati, and R. Frayne
Unenhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries with Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Dixon Method
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Soulez, M. Pasowicz, G. Benea, L. Grazioli, J. P. Niedmann, M. Konopka, P. C. Douek, G. Morana, F. K. W. Schaefer, A. Vanzulli, et al.
Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Angiography--Comparison with DSA
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 273 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Ota, K. Takase, H. Rikimaru, M. Tsuboi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, S. Higano, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1141 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. J. Kwolek
Endovascular Management of Renal Artery Stenosis: Current Techniques and Results
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2004; 16(4): 261 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. B. C. Vasbinder, P. J. Nelemans, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, J. H. Maki, T. Leiner, F. J.A. Beek, M. B.J.M. Korst, K. Flobbe, M. W. de Haan, et al.
Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis
Ann Intern Med, November 2, 2004; 141(9): 674 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Olin, J. A. Kaufman, D. A. Bluemke, R. O. Bonow, M. D. Gerhard, M. R. Jaff, G. D. Rubin, and W. Hall
Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group IV: Imaging
Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2626 - 2633.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Carlos, D. A. Axelrod, J. H. Ellis, P. H. Abrahamse, and A. M. Fendrick
Incorporating Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness: Imaging Strategies for Renovascular Hypertension
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1653 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. B. C. Vasbinder, P. J. Nelemans, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, P. W. de Leeuw, and J. M.A. van Engelshoven
Diagnostic Tests for Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients Suspected of Having Renovascular Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis
Ann Intern Med, September 18, 2001; 135(6): 401 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. C. Rankin, W. Jan, and C. G. Koffman
Noninvasive Imaging of Living Related Kidney Donors: Evaluation with CT Angiography and Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 349 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T K Mittal, C Evans, T Perkins, and A M Wood
Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography--clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. F. Glockner
Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography: Applications for Abdominal Imaging
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 357 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. B. Fain, B. F. King, J. F. Breen, D. G. Kruger, and S. J. Riederer
High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: A Prospective Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 481 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Ernst, V. Asnar, G. Sergent, E. Lederman, L. Nicol, J.-C. Paris, and C. L'Hermine
Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography and Conventional Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, T. Ishimori, K. Oda, T. Hayashi, A. Hiyama, and Y. Dodo
Dynamic Subtraction Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 135 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Q. Dong, S. O. Schoenberg, R. C. Carlos, M. Neimatallah, K. J. Cho, D. M. Williams, S. N. Kazanjian, and M. R. Prince
Diagnosis of Renal Vascular Disease with MR Angiography
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1535 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. S. Lee, N. M. Rofsky, G. A. Krinsky, D. H. Stemerman, and J. C. Weinreb
Single-Dose Breath-hold Gadolinium-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 69 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Mallouhi, M. Schocke, W. Judmaier, C. Wolf, A. Dessl, B. V. Czermak, P. Waldenberger, and W. R. Jaschke
3D MR Angiography of Renal Arteries: Comparison of Volume Rendering and Maximum Intensity Projection Algorithms
Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.