|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 459-464, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
RK Zeman, C Cooper, AS Zeiberg, A Kladakis, PM Silverman, JL Marshall, SR Evans, T Stahl, R Buras, RJ Nauta, JV Sitzmann and F al-Kawas
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of helical CT scanning in predicting the stage of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas using TNM staging guidelines and in predicting resectability of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas underwent uniphasic or biphasic helical CT scanning. Two observers unaware of the patient's surgical stage evaluated the CT examinations using the TNM system (with specific assessment and description of disease sites). In addition, the two observers rated confidence of nonresectability using a 5-point scale (ranging from 1, definitely resectable, to 5, definitely not resectable). Observer results and preoperative interpretations were compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: Nineteen of 26 patients had nonresectable disease. The combined observer scores showed correct determination of T stage in 77% of patients, of N stage in 58%, and of M stage in 79%. The overall accuracy in determining lack of resectability was 96% and 84% for the two observers. All errors in determining resectable versus nonresectable disease occurred when the observer was not maximally confident of his or her diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is an effective screening technique for assessing T and M stages of pancreatic carcinoma. However, helical CT is poor at detecting regional lymph node involvement. In patients with equivocal T-stage findings (such as questionable venous involvement), other studies such as endoscopic sonography may be of value.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Maithel, K. Khalili, E. Dixon, M. Guindi, M. P. Callery, M. S. Cattral, B. R. Taylor, S. Gallinger, P. D. Greig, D. R. Grant, et al. Impact of Regional Lymph Node Evaluation in Staging Patients With Periampullary Tumors Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 202 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. DeWitt, B. Devereaux, M. Chriswell, K. McGreevy, T. Howard, T. F. Imperiale, D. Ciaccia, K. A. Lane, D. Maglinte, K. Kopecky, et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic Cancer Ann Intern Med, November 16, 2004; 141(10): 753 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Roche, M. L. Hughes, C. J. Garvey, F. Campbell, D. A. White, L. Jones, and J. P. Neoptolemos CT and Pathologic Assessment of Prospective Nodal Staging in Patients with Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 475 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Prokesch, L. C. Chow, C. F. Beaulieu, M. Nino-Murcia, R. E. Mindelzun, R. Bammer, J. Huang, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr Local Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma with Multi-Detector Row CT: Use of Curved Planar Reformations—Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 759 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshimitsu, H. Honda, K. Shinozaki, H. Aibe, T. Kuroiwa, H. Irie, K. Chijiiwa, Y. Asayama, and K. Masuda Helical CT of the Local Spread of Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Evaluation According to the TNM System in Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, L. Camera, L. Pace, P. P. Mainenti, M. Romano, G. Selva, and M. Salvatore Dual-Phase Versus Single-Phase Helical CT to Detect and Assess Resectability of Pancreatic Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1473 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. McMahon, E. F. Halpern, C. Fernandez-del Castillo, J. W. Clark, and G. S. Gazelle Pancreatic Cancer: Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging Technologies for Assessing Resectability Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 93 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Prassopoulos, I. Tritou, N. Papanikolaou, N. Gourtsoyiannis, and V. Raptopoulos Deformity of the Superior Mesenteric Vein: MR Sign of Pancreatic Cancer Unresectability Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176 (6): 1600 - 1601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishiharu, Y. Yamashita, Y. Abe, K. Mitsuzaki, T. Tsuchigame, Y. Nakayama, and M. Takahashi Local Extension of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Assessment with Thin-Section Helical CT versus with Breath-hold Fast MR Imaging—ROC Analysis Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 445 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kim, T. Murakami, S. Takahashi, A. Okada, M. Hori, Y. Narumi, and H. Nakamura Pancreatic CT Imaging: Effects of Different Injection Rates and Doses of Contrast Material Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 219 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Suits, R. Frazee, and R. A. Erickson Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration for the Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses Arch Surg, June 1, 1999; 134(6): 639 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Aschoff, J. Görich, R. Sokiranski, A. Rieber, H.-J. Brambs, and S. C. Krämer Pancreas: Does Hyoscyamine Butylbromide Increase the Diagnostic Value of Helical CT? Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 861 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |