AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by al-Kawas, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by al-Kawas, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 459-464, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

TNM staging of pancreatic carcinoma using helical CT

RK Zeman, C Cooper, AS Zeiberg, A Kladakis, PM Silverman, JL Marshall, SR Evans, T Stahl, R Buras, RJ Nauta, JV Sitzmann and F al-Kawas
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of helical CT scanning in predicting the stage of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas using TNM staging guidelines and in predicting resectability of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas underwent uniphasic or biphasic helical CT scanning. Two observers unaware of the patient's surgical stage evaluated the CT examinations using the TNM system (with specific assessment and description of disease sites). In addition, the two observers rated confidence of nonresectability using a 5-point scale (ranging from 1, definitely resectable, to 5, definitely not resectable). Observer results and preoperative interpretations were compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: Nineteen of 26 patients had nonresectable disease. The combined observer scores showed correct determination of T stage in 77% of patients, of N stage in 58%, and of M stage in 79%. The overall accuracy in determining lack of resectability was 96% and 84% for the two observers. All errors in determining resectable versus nonresectable disease occurred when the observer was not maximally confident of his or her diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is an effective screening technique for assessing T and M stages of pancreatic carcinoma. However, helical CT is poor at detecting regional lymph node involvement. In patients with equivocal T-stage findings (such as questionable venous involvement), other studies such as endoscopic sonography may be of value.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. K. Maithel, K. Khalili, E. Dixon, M. Guindi, M. P. Callery, M. S. Cattral, B. R. Taylor, S. Gallinger, P. D. Greig, D. R. Grant, et al.
Impact of Regional Lymph Node Evaluation in Staging Patients With Periampullary Tumors
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 202 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. DeWitt, B. Devereaux, M. Chriswell, K. McGreevy, T. Howard, T. F. Imperiale, D. Ciaccia, K. A. Lane, D. Maglinte, K. Kopecky, et al.
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic Cancer
Ann Intern Med, November 16, 2004; 141(10): 753 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. J. Roche, M. L. Hughes, C. J. Garvey, F. Campbell, D. A. White, L. Jones, and J. P. Neoptolemos
CT and Pathologic Assessment of Prospective Nodal Staging in Patients with Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 475 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. W. Prokesch, L. C. Chow, C. F. Beaulieu, M. Nino-Murcia, R. E. Mindelzun, R. Bammer, J. Huang, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr
Local Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma with Multi-Detector Row CT: Use of Curved Planar Reformations—Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 759 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Yoshimitsu, H. Honda, K. Shinozaki, H. Aibe, T. Kuroiwa, H. Irie, K. Chijiiwa, Y. Asayama, and K. Masuda
Helical CT of the Local Spread of Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Evaluation According to the TNM System in Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 423 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, L. Camera, L. Pace, P. P. Mainenti, M. Romano, G. Selva, and M. Salvatore
Dual-Phase Versus Single-Phase Helical CT to Detect and Assess Resectability of Pancreatic Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. M. McMahon, E. F. Halpern, C. Fernandez-del Castillo, J. W. Clark, and G. S. Gazelle
Pancreatic Cancer: Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging Technologies for Assessing Resectability
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 93 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Prassopoulos, I. Tritou, N. Papanikolaou, N. Gourtsoyiannis, and V. Raptopoulos
Deformity of the Superior Mesenteric Vein: MR Sign of Pancreatic Cancer Unresectability
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176 (6): 1600 - 1601.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Nishiharu, Y. Yamashita, Y. Abe, K. Mitsuzaki, T. Tsuchigame, Y. Nakayama, and M. Takahashi
Local Extension of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Assessment with Thin-Section Helical CT versus with Breath-hold Fast MR Imaging—ROC Analysis
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Kim, T. Murakami, S. Takahashi, A. Okada, M. Hori, Y. Narumi, and H. Nakamura
Pancreatic CT Imaging: Effects of Different Injection Rates and Doses of Contrast Material
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. Suits, R. Frazee, and R. A. Erickson
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration for the Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses
Arch Surg, June 1, 1999; 134(6): 639 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Aschoff, J. Görich, R. Sokiranski, A. Rieber, H.-J. Brambs, and S. C. Krämer
Pancreas: Does Hyoscyamine Butylbromide Increase the Diagnostic Value of Helical CT?
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 861 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.