AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Castellino, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Castellino, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 521-525, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

CT detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: assessment of size and distribution criteria

S Hilton, HW Herr, JB Teitcher, CB Begg and RA Castellino
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis with no evidence of metastatic disease after orchiectomy may be managed with either retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or surveillance. The present retrospective study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of CT for revealing retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed clinical stage 1 testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis when smaller size criteria (smaller than 10 mm) are applied and to test the hypothesis that CT-revealed anterior retroperitoneal lymph nodes are more likely to correlate with metastases than are posterior lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal CT scans obtained before surgery in 70 patients were reviewed by three observers who were unaware of the results of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The sizes and sites of all lymph nodes measuring larger than or equal to 4 mm were recorded. Each CT scan was judged as positive or negative for retroperitoneal metastasis on the basis of the size of the largest measured lymph node at the expected metastatic site. Diameters of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm were successively applied to each case as the criteria for a positive scan. RESULTS: Using a criterion of 10 mm or larger for metastases, we calculated a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 100%; with a 4-mm criterion, the sensitivity was 93% and the specificity was 58%. Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing the accuracy of CT for revealing similar-sized lymph nodes located anterior or posterior to a line bisecting the aorta differed significantly (p = .04) when the same criteria were applied to lymph nodes in both regions. CONCLUSION: False-negative rates were decreased from 63% using a size criterion of 10 mm to as low as 7% using a size criterion of 4 mm, with a corresponding decrease in specificity. Lymph nodes measuring larger than or equal to 4 mm, especially those located anterior to the mid portion of the aorta, should raise a suspicion of metastases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Sohaib, D.-M. Koh, and J. E. Husband
The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Testicular Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 387 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. de Wit
Cutting Back on Computed Tomography Scan Frequency in Curative Oncology: Get the Picture
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1308 - 1309.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. de Wit and K. Fizazi
Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5482 - 5492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B. S. Carver and J. Sheinfeld
Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 12(11): 871 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. G. Harisinghani, W. T. Dixon, M. A. Saksena, E. Brachtel, D. J. Blezek, P. J. Dhawale, M. Torabi, and P. F. Hahn
MR Lymphangiography: Imaging Strategies to Optimize the Imaging of Lymph Nodes with Ferumoxtran-10
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 867 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Albers, R. Siener, S. Kliesch, L. Weissbach, S. Krege, C. Sparwasser, H. Schulze, A. Heidenreich, W. de Riese, V. Loy, et al.
Risk Factors for Relapse in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1505 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Gollub, D. M. Panicek, A. M. Bach, A. Penalver, and R. A. Castellino
Clinical Importance of Reinterpretation of Body CT Scans Obtained Elsewhere in Patients Referred for Care at a Tertiary Cancer Center
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 109 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.