|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 521-525, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
S Hilton, HW Herr, JB Teitcher, CB Begg and RA Castellino
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis with no evidence of metastatic disease after orchiectomy may be managed with either retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or surveillance. The present retrospective study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of CT for revealing retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed clinical stage 1 testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of the testis when smaller size criteria (smaller than 10 mm) are applied and to test the hypothesis that CT-revealed anterior retroperitoneal lymph nodes are more likely to correlate with metastases than are posterior lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal CT scans obtained before surgery in 70 patients were reviewed by three observers who were unaware of the results of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The sizes and sites of all lymph nodes measuring larger than or equal to 4 mm were recorded. Each CT scan was judged as positive or negative for retroperitoneal metastasis on the basis of the size of the largest measured lymph node at the expected metastatic site. Diameters of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm were successively applied to each case as the criteria for a positive scan. RESULTS: Using a criterion of 10 mm or larger for metastases, we calculated a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 100%; with a 4-mm criterion, the sensitivity was 93% and the specificity was 58%. Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing the accuracy of CT for revealing similar-sized lymph nodes located anterior or posterior to a line bisecting the aorta differed significantly (p = .04) when the same criteria were applied to lymph nodes in both regions. CONCLUSION: False-negative rates were decreased from 63% using a size criterion of 10 mm to as low as 7% using a size criterion of 4 mm, with a corresponding decrease in specificity. Lymph nodes measuring larger than or equal to 4 mm, especially those located anterior to the mid portion of the aorta, should raise a suspicion of metastases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Sohaib, D.-M. Koh, and J. E. Husband The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Testicular Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 387 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. de Wit Cutting Back on Computed Tomography Scan Frequency in Curative Oncology: Get the Picture J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1308 - 1309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. de Wit and K. Fizazi Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5482 - 5492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Carver and J. Sheinfeld Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 12(11): 871 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Harisinghani, W. T. Dixon, M. A. Saksena, E. Brachtel, D. J. Blezek, P. J. Dhawale, M. Torabi, and P. F. Hahn MR Lymphangiography: Imaging Strategies to Optimize the Imaging of Lymph Nodes with Ferumoxtran-10 RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 867 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Albers, R. Siener, S. Kliesch, L. Weissbach, S. Krege, C. Sparwasser, H. Schulze, A. Heidenreich, W. de Riese, V. Loy, et al. Risk Factors for Relapse in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1505 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Gollub, D. M. Panicek, A. M. Bach, A. Penalver, and R. A. Castellino Clinical Importance of Reinterpretation of Body CT Scans Obtained Elsewhere in Patients Referred for Care at a Tertiary Cancer Center Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 109 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |