American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 569-573, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Evaluation of contrast densities in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis by CT angiography

JL Claves, SW Wise, KD Hopper, D Tully, TR Ten Have and J Weaver
College of Medicine, Penn State University/Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses intravascular density produced by ionic and nonionic contrast material and its effect on visualization of stenoses by CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT angiography was performed using a 32-vessel phantom to study grades of luminal stenoses (0-100%), three lengths of stenoses (1, 3, and 5 mm), and two angles of inclination into the stenoses (45 degrees and 75 degrees). Scans were obtained with a slice thickness of 2 mm, a slice interval of 1.5 mm, a pitch of 1.0, a voltage of 120 kV, and a current of both 100 and 200 mA. Vessels were oriented parallel to the z-axis, and opacified with ionic and nonionic contrast material that had densities of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 H. Cross-sectional luminal diameters were measured in and out of the stenoses. Edge definition and halo artifact for each vessel were graded by an investigator who was unaware of the contrast material density used. RESULTS: A contrast density of 150 H as revealed by CT angiography yielded the most accurate stenosis measurements with ionic contrast material. For nonionic contrast material, attenuation values of 150 and 200 H produced the best results on CT angiography. A density of 100 H or greater than 250 H significantly increased the error of vessel measurement (p = .001) for both types of contrast material. For the two current levels tested (100 and 200 mA), no statistical difference was found. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of CT angiography in measuring carotid stenosis depends on the luminal attenuation value. An optimum contrast density is 150 H for ionic contrast material; for nonionic contrast material, 150-200 H (at the window and level settings of 300 H and 40 H).
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Saba and G. Mallarin Window Settings for the Study of Calcified Carotid Plaques with Multidetector CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2009; 30(7): 1445 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, F. J. Ahlhelm, E. S. Bartlett, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Simplification of the residual lumen geometry in measuring carodid stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 804 - 804. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Villablanca, F. J. Rodriguez, T. Stockman, S. Dahliwal, M. Omura, S. Hazany, and J. Sayre MDCT Angiography for Detection and Quantification of Small Intracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Catheter Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Kim, E. M. Marom, J. E. Herndon II, and H. P. McAdams Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B. Ertl-Wagner, R.-T. Hoffmann, R. Bruning, K. Herrmann, B. Snyder, J. D. Blume, and M. F. Reiser Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography of the Brain at Various Kilovoltage Settings Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 528 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text]